Just imagine in 2008 it will be Moore and lets and hillary as vice president, Jane Fonda for Secreatry of Defense (NO MORE WARS) and a democratic controlled congress, and senate and I mean Extreme Left dems, this countries economy would rocket and the dow would hit 20,000 in know time
2006-07-02 09:07:58 · 36 answers · asked by Janet G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No - why would we want a chronic liar and America hater in charge
2006-07-02 09:28:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dan W 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you crazy, or are you being sarcastic? I hope you're being sarcastic. If the economy goes up that much, there's one huge problem you fail to consider: the cost of living goes up, which means that while people have more money, that money doesn't buy as much. Thus, when inflation is adjusted, and when the economy catches up (normally takes between 6 and 10 years), the economy will be in ruins, and we'll have an economy much the same as the economy of Serbia in the early '90s, where a piece of paper cost $2000. Not good.
2006-07-02 09:13:10 · answer #2 · answered by rliedtky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Moore would better serve as a Supreme Court Justice. I say Stephen Colbert for Prez with Jon Stewart as VP. Angelina Jolie as Secretary of State, Wesley Clark as Sec of Defense, Congressman Ron Paul as Secretary of the Treasury...
2006-07-02 09:13:05 · answer #3 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FINALLY...someone that recognizes that Moore is a genius and should be rewarded for doing the dirty work the rest of the country is to blind and lazy to find for themselves. If we had a president that was half as concerned for what's wrong in this country we'd all be better for it. Enough of this political bullshit of who can raise the most money and who can play the sympathy card the most times in one campaign. Lets start the campaign fo Moore/Clinton 2008!
2006-07-02 09:16:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Michael Moore and a lot of his work but I don't know that it would be a good idea for him to be president. However, if it were between him or a member of the Bush family...I would vote for Moore. I wouldn't even have to think twice on that.
2006-07-02 09:10:30 · answer #5 · answered by zenkitty27 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG!!!!! NOOOOO!!! I wouldn't have that lying slob as President if I had to do it! I guess you people would see just what a mess you've created over the years with that crowd in office, but it's just too risky to even imagine it. Gosh, I hope I can't get that horrible thought out of my head so I can eat supper and sleep.
2006-07-02 09:33:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that would be a good idea, I think his films were good but he is not as truthful as you'd like to think. I think you need a president for each major political party to be in power at the same time, best not to have one person in charge. There would be a better chance for compromise between issues.
2006-07-02 09:13:37 · answer #7 · answered by The Great Turtle Speaks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not Michael Moore he comes off as a giant socialist weasel to quote Matt Stone but i would like a liberal to get president this time
2006-07-02 09:13:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you must be joking....neither of them will be even close to working towards a serious nomination.
Be serious.........Micheal Moore is nothing more that an instigator and don't get me started on Fonda...
Nice try and a great joke.....not really funny, but not all jokes are funny, I guess.....
2006-07-02 10:28:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should not be our president because it would cost all of us money by the white house having to change the size of the commode.
2006-07-02 09:12:15 · answer #10 · answered by ANTHONY M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do Bush-haters always seem to have a problem with grammar and spelling?
2006-07-02 15:30:02 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋