They are both famous preformers. On that level they are equal...so what's the difference. R. Kelly is more of a threat than Michael all parents have to do is keep their son's away from Michael. R. Kelly on the other hand, any young is fair game. The one on the tape was the niece of Sparkle, someone he worked with. So why in the H*** is R. Kelly still walking around free?
2006-07-02 08:56:12 · 3 answers · asked by A B 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Good question. I guess messing with black girls isn't as big as a crime as messing with white boys.
People ran and got R. Kelly's cds in droves and nobody complained about his rumored atraction for young girls.
Although I would have to question it. If I was in his shoes I wouldn't have done the following:
perform with B2K, Nick Cannon and Marques Houston in concerts since they attract the same young girls I'm accused of raping. Something about that says guilt to me and wouldn't that attract girls that want to be caught with him in the first place?
2006-07-04 18:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by skyvolt2000 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because no one gives a **** about R. Kelly. Michael Jackson is much more high profile.
2006-07-02 08:59:46 · answer #2 · answered by Hot Pants 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cos Jackson is white and Kelly is black:))
2006-07-02 09:00:59 · answer #3 · answered by Kalahari_Surfer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋