Explain? Would they say the kitten was a threat to
a. national security
b.traditional pet ownership
c.heterosexual marriage
d.the kitten was hiding stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction in hidden underground bunkers and that the intel came in that it was searching for yellow cake uranium somewhere in Africa
2006-07-02 08:52:16 · 15 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
aww come on mymadsky we all no clinton chased a chubby one every now and then but come on he i prefer not to think about 10 year olds getting raped you sick bastard
2006-07-02 09:01:17 · update #1
The cat was a ring leader of Al Catta, an evil terrorist organization pervading the internet that is pushing feline exploitation, aka Kitty Porn, on the 'net.
Al Gore, instrumental in creating the free net we know today, will also be rounded up and shot, and the Net Neutrality act will be replaced by the Patriot-Net, which requires every user have an open webcam and a permanent connection to the NSA so they can be monitored.
2006-07-02 09:05:28 · answer #1 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a riduculous supposition in the first place which doesn't even deserve a response. But how about the fact that Clinton was accused of rape by Juanita Broderick and I believed every word of her story. Pretty embarrassing to have an alleged rapist as President. If you want to denigrate President Bush at least TRY to pose a somewhat intelligent question that has some basis in reality. Must be hot today where you are, mommy must have let you drink too much koolaid. LOL
2006-07-02 16:15:42 · answer #2 · answered by MamaBear1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And if Clinton banged a 10 year old on the same spot the rest of the media would justify that...how?
I'll add:
I totally understand your point. My intent was to be just as absurd as the question you asked.
Yes Fox "news" is biased but then you also have to look at other main-stream media which is biased to the left. Does it really matter in the scale of things?
2006-07-02 15:55:39 · answer #3 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure it would be proven to be an evil kitten- a bad guy. Maybe he had kitty litter of mas destruction.
2006-07-02 15:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Robsthings 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Surely an intelligent mind could formulate a more intelligent question. Oops what did I just assume?
2006-07-02 16:02:28 · answer #5 · answered by thetdw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOUR QUESTION IS SO PREPOSTEROUS BUT SEEING HOW THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL IS A VOCAL CHORD FOR BUSH, I WOULD SAY THAT ANSWER"D"LOOKS GOOD TO ME.....SUCH A PROPAGANDA STATION....SEEMS THEY ALL END UP EATING THERE WORDS ON FOX AT ONE TIME OR THE OTHER.....AND THEIR VENOMOUS COMMENTS AGAINST ARABS AND THE ISLAMIC FAITH IS DISGUSTING. WHAT IF PEOPLE SAID THOSE KIND OF COMMENTS ON A DIFFERENT NEWS PROGRAM ABOUT THEIR JEWISH HERITAGE, THEY SURELY WOULDN'T STAND FOR IT.
2006-07-02 16:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean the F entertainment news channel! You know what the F stands for and the W stands for WHO you know.
2006-07-02 16:20:50 · answer #7 · answered by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox news would supply both the kitten and the gun!
2006-07-02 16:50:49 · answer #8 · answered by Lloyd L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if he ate it afterwards.
If he shot Osama on the Whie House lawn would you find a reason to bash him for it?
2006-07-02 16:00:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dam you said it right .those idiots think the American public is so stupid that they could just say any thing out of the box and it's believable .i watch just to get a good laugh .lol
2006-07-02 16:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋