Tom Tancredo, the representative from Colorado will probably be the next president of the United States. He is a staunch conservative and will be able to rally the republican base which is threatening to boycott the next election because their interests have been ignored for the last 6 years.
But, that's not why he will be elected. He will be elected because he is the prime mover and shaker behind real immigration reform in this country. People are highly pissed over what the senate attempted to do (total amnesty plus a ten fold increase in immigration is what the senate bill amounts to). Nearly 90% of the people in this country want this issue fixed and are willing to vote whomever promises to fix it into office. Currently, the only major political figure to have done anything even remotely correct with regard to this is Tom Tancredo.
He'll run on immigration reform and he will win with a landslide.
Note that he won't have much competition. Al Gore is currently the best chance the democrats have. And a recent poll showed that less than 10% of people are willing to vote for him.
A huge majority of people say they would definitely vote for an immigration reform candidate, no matter what party he belongs to.
You figure it out.
2006-07-02 08:17:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Gosh, I am sure that the Republicans can find someone dishonest enough to run.
I can despise the Republicans and still support the very courageous troops like your husband. I think that the best way to support the troops is to not send them into harm's way based on bad intelliegence selfish intentions. They were sent without the right equipment (troops on the ground STILL do not have enough flak jackets or helmets), and the news that torture was accepted (accepted not just in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib, but by using something called rendition to torture people outside of US law) actually endangers our military men and women overseas. If the enemy sees us very willing to torture, they will do exactly the same thing to those troops they capture. The rare instances of people who are released after being kidnapped will stop completely, and the kidnappings (and eventual executions) will actually increase.
I go to church and pray that whoever becomes the next President actually obeys the law, and works hard to use our American forces sensibly, and not wastefully. Mr. bush has not earned my prayers, and come Judgment Day, I am pretty sure he is heading to the very warm place. He is a bad, bad man who uses fear to get his way, like a bully.
2006-07-02 23:40:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by arcayne_1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doesn't matter. The Republicans have already lost the election in 2008. No on in their right mind is going to go through another 4 years like we did for the last 6.
2006-07-02 08:14:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by pickle head 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
once you're observing for a background it somewhat began in the process Goldwater's marketing campaign whilst the Christian terrific suited was first forming, the leaders took an interest in Goldwater, even though it actually wasn't till Nixon's Southern technique the place he pandered to the Christian good to win the South (and as a result on the time the election). the area is that once anybody is indoctrinated like the persons you're conversing approximately are that's almost impossible to reason with them and a political candidate would not extremely have a purpose to purpose to alter critiques, in a democratic equipment that's lots less complicated to realize and shelter vigor via beautiful to a delegated base. that's much greater easy to sell books to them which do no longer contradict thier ideals, take a glance on the politics section at your interior of sight bookstore. i could say it may take approximately thirty to 40 years at minimum or 50 to sixty years at maximum. this is how long it is going to take the nut-jobs to die, with a bit of luck after residing happy lives no longer ruined via the coverage policies they propose, and as a result stop balloting. yet then presented that intellectuals artwork troublesome to instruct and motivate youthful human beings. Oh and for the persons who could desire to call one i'm going to do you one larger a itemizing of the non secular idiots ruining the GOP: Pat Robertson, former presidential hopefull Michelle Bachaman, Congresswoman cutting-edge presidential hopeful Rick Perry cutting-edge Governor of Texas prayed for rain on a similar time as reducing the fireman's money for the time of wildfires Jerry Falwell ineffective now yet founding father of the "ethical majority" Robert furnish writer of The Christian Voice Ralph E. Reed, Jr. needless to say the administrative of The Christian Coalition Oral Roberts ineffective even though founding father of Oral Roberts college which seems "proficient" zealots. Mark Rutland took over from Oral i could circulate on even though it may get too long
2016-11-01 02:30:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ohio Gov. Bob Taft is the logical choice. He has a famous political name, is a two-term governor of a major state, can barely string a sentence together, and is completely incompetent.
2006-07-02 08:26:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by J C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Alfred E Newman
2006-07-02 08:12:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well lets just say that hopefully no republican will ever take the presidents chair again.i hate all of this political bull anyhow, but still those damn republicans are up to no good
2006-07-02 08:12:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that RINO McCain is going to have a go. I wish-oh how I wish-Condi would run!
There is also much talk about Tancredo.
2006-07-02 08:14:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Mcain is gonna make a bid for the nomination, its why he was sucking up to Falwell.
2006-07-02 08:11:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by frankramirez_81 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whoever Haliburton wants to run.
2006-07-02 08:11:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3
·
0⤊
0⤋