that's a toughy question. You better put your thinking hat on...
2006-07-02 06:01:01 · 16 answers · asked by envi v 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
1. England aren't stinker, hey okay they may not have played their best but at least they put their heart and souls into it and played like proper decent human beings unlike other cheating, diving teams....And they at least tried to refrain from going down at the slightest knock.
2. Brazil aren't that bad, but they didn't put that much effort into their performances and thought they would win or reputation alone. So you cant really say they are stinkers
3.Where are the rest of the teams which DIDN'T actually even manage to make it through to the semi's? Obviously they are worse than the two teams you have chosen.
4.You cant judge who were the worst anyways
5. All the players tried their best to help their team win (England as i didn't see the Brazil matches) so you cant call them stinkers for that, at least they tried.
2006-07-02 06:13:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im going with Brazil. England allways chokes. Everyone knew they would not make it to the finals. Brazil should have played so much better. They played like they wanted to lose. Getting there first shot in stoppage time if not alittle before that. They played horrible and wheather you like them or not they were probably your pick to be in the finals.
2006-07-02 13:16:11 · answer #2 · answered by panthers23ae 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all the way I thought England were the stinkers, but you know....after watching that game they played pretty strong and I was so for Brazil but they put me down. Oh well, they've had that win for many years....let someone else take it this time.
2006-07-02 13:05:47 · answer #3 · answered by Sunny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brazil- they weren't even playing well. At least England tried. But I was sorely dissappointed that Beckham resigned as Captain.
2006-07-02 13:04:48 · answer #4 · answered by RP 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England, supposed by many to be choke artists, were not really supposed to win now were they? Brazil on the other hand... Does that answer your question?
2006-07-02 13:08:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brazil was in the word cup as at the beginning the winner. the names dont play alone
2006-07-02 13:04:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brazil b'coz they think they are divine and knowbody can beat them especially carlos who was holding his hips for resting while the free kick was taken which eventually led to the goal by henry.
2006-07-02 13:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by sanjay kumar 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would have to say england...
they were really confident and they played their worst on the field...
they were soo bad the game went into overtime and even during this time they couldnt score a goal...
but then brazil also played their worst game..
they were hopeless in the game against france...
2006-07-02 13:04:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think Brazil did`t played to their full potential,but i would`t call them a stinker
2006-07-02 13:09:53 · answer #9 · answered by I am every man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England, the game was slow and boring. I love soccer and I love both of those teams but to be honest it was England.
2006-07-02 13:04:49 · answer #10 · answered by Shorty 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋