English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am 55 and have Degenerative Disc Disease and Hepetitis C. I was reccomended to draw disability in California 9 yrs. ago, and made it to the Aministrative Law Judge stage, but moved and couldn't afford to wait any longer and returned to work. My condition worsens with age, and I have now been diagnosed with Hep C. When I was trying to collect it In California I heard that it was easier to get when you pass 50. Is this true?

2006-07-02 05:29:32 · 3 answers · asked by Little Tree 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

Age is not SUPPOSED to be a determining factor in SSI. However, obviously, the older you get the tougher it is to heal up and get back to work. Make sure you have a doctor that will write you an opinion that you are PERMANANTLY AND TOTALLY DISABLED FROM EMPLOYMENT and perhaps get what is called a vocational expert to state that their are no jobs available for you. With these two items you should have a good shot at being awarded disability.
Almost everyone I know is denied with the initial application and you'll probably have to appeal the decision. I would suggest getting an attorney to help you with your appeal. They will likely set you up with the doctors you'll need to win.

good luck

2006-07-02 05:36:50 · answer #1 · answered by answerman 2 · 0 0

I recommend that the top shrink for contributions be executed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless stay as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "supply away" software yet one that all of us make contributions to love a reductions plan, and can be shielded from different makes use of by employing the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so fearful approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it back into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for his or her very own pastime, 2d pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet on no account paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the same for each individual; in different words government officers are to take area in it and in the event that they want some thing extra they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had on no account been quite replaced. They, a team of scholars, stated that one and all costs of pastime may be 3% or much less for each individual to become wealthy if wished (that could desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the appropriate financial problem may be, they pronounced, whilst there have been no costs of pastime. Why no longer attempt this answer? the wealthy might nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial protection will become an issue related to federal money owed, why no longer artwork with a balanced or earnings budget and spend no extra advantageous than is geared up in, as any kinfolk has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents as a manner to get rules that serve the rustic? God bless u.s..

2016-12-10 03:33:42 · answer #2 · answered by tollefson 4 · 0 0

Yes, but if you find the right shyster lawyer you can get it at any age.It will cost you $$$ up front.

2006-07-02 05:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by Billy M 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers