English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So who do you think had the best World cup?

Theo Walcott or Ledley King?? ;^)

£20 million to make player selections like those...I'm clearly in the wrong job!!

Thoughts/feedback?

2006-07-02 04:35:23 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

Sorry I meant to say player not Striker. Ledley King isn't a striker.

2006-07-02 04:42:10 · update #1

31 answers

idk, but not rooney

2006-07-02 04:37:31 · answer #1 · answered by Kelly P 4 · 0 0

Wasn't Rooney or Owen, Crouch played crap and oh yeah Walcott didn't play so does that answer your question. Isn't Ledley King a defender. Thanks for the 2 points.

2006-07-02 04:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

NONE.:) The whole team did not show up the whole tournament. Paraguay game was won by an own goal. Against attacking Sweden who thought before the game they needed a must win, they could not even preserve a wine. Trinidad game could have even been written as a loss in their column. Ecuador game one shot, one goal. They had a sorry performance. I like the British team but they never play good in big competitions.

2006-07-02 04:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by PANCHO 4 · 0 0

If you think about it Walcott had a great World cup.

He got paid to see every England game from the edge of the pitch. Had a nice holiday and no pressure because he knew there was no chance he was going to get picked.

I wish someone would pay for a holiday for me like that.

2006-07-02 05:55:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of the players can claim to have had a good world cup, the only thing they manged was to beat the rush for flights home before the final.

2006-07-11 07:13:15 · answer #5 · answered by Dirty Rob 3 · 0 0

Well Crouch was the only striker that scored for us - but the answer is none of them - they all had a poor world cup for one reason or another.

2006-07-02 04:40:03 · answer #6 · answered by Jaws 3 · 0 0

sven had the best one made a fortune for guiding us away from the easiest world cup[ finals yet it was there for the taking neva mind us daft mugs will keep buying the merchandise the sweden manager said sven salary was obscene and boy he was right id love a job where i get 23 million for fukin everything up

2006-07-10 12:02:36 · answer #7 · answered by silver scales 3 · 0 0

Steven Gerrard and Crouch + Beckham had a good world cup in my opinion.

2006-07-12 15:41:25 · answer #8 · answered by JAM123 7 · 0 0

I would say owen hargreaves was one of the only players to catch the eye, a lot of our players didnt really turn up for this tournament

2006-07-10 05:22:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of em. I reckon they both had a boring World Cup. Like all of us they had to watch a bunch of overpaid lazy b@st@rds!!!

Nobody enjoys doing that.

2006-07-12 22:27:49 · answer #10 · answered by gavin.white 2 · 0 0

Walcott. he stayed on the bench most of the time.

2006-07-02 04:48:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers