English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-30 20:24:14 · 11 answers · asked by bindiboi 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

Not papparatzi, legit photo sessions.

2006-06-30 21:05:33 · update #1

11 answers

I guess it's supposed to make them seem more down-to-earth and natural. The casual look is in!

2006-07-13 19:04:18 · answer #1 · answered by Jeffrey S 6 · 0 0

I'm going to suppose that it takes that "I'm wearing (insert expensive designer shoe brand here) bc I can afford it" effect out of the picture. Maybe it makes them more down to earth...no pun intended.

2006-07-13 16:02:56 · answer #2 · answered by Afrodite 2 · 0 0

casual & relaxed who wants to see a pair of shoes on a celeb that would cost you a week's pay

2006-07-14 15:14:36 · answer #3 · answered by ciscokid 1 · 0 0

Because a whole lot of folks have a fetish for barefoot celebrities.

2006-07-01 03:30:36 · answer #4 · answered by Allan S 2 · 0 0

If they had shoes on then the question you'd be asking is "Why do they have shoes on, is something wrong with their feet?"

2006-07-14 13:42:24 · answer #5 · answered by Nataldy 1 · 0 0

Two words: Foot Fetish.

2006-07-14 02:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by fay_baby_girl 1 · 0 0

To make them seem more relaxed?

2006-07-11 21:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by Padme 5 · 0 0

cuz their sik fukzz who well wait in the bush just to get a good picture....(not)

2006-07-01 03:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by woody r 2 · 0 0

Better posture I guess.

2006-07-13 09:47:53 · answer #9 · answered by exotic69n 3 · 0 0

who needs shoes ?

2006-07-13 06:23:54 · answer #10 · answered by ▲▼ßððĝiз▼▲ 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers