Our universe has vast clumps of matter (stars, galaxies, quasars, etc.) The parallel universes move through this 11th dimension like waves, and these waves could ripple like most usually do. The ripples went on to cause the clumps of matter after the big bang. Our universe is one of an infinite number of membranes, just one of the many universes which make up the multiverse.
2006-06-30 18:36:00 · 10 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Exce;;ent question....
2006-06-30 19:05:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I will put it in simple words. We have all read the theory of conservation of mass -right? That nothing can neither be created nor destroyed. When we burn a candle it disappears? Not really so.It,in fact,gets converted to carbon di oxide and water vapor and some other products. If we do proper analysis we will conclude matter was conserved in this conversion!
Now the question puzzling mankind from days immemorial is how come so much matter, what we see on earth, planets,stars, galaxies nebulas,milky way or the all encompassing universe was created? This question borders more on philosophy rather than science. Let me bluntly state there are no satisfactory answers as of date and I doubt there ever will be. Big bang theory tries to solve this riddle. But still does not answer the basic question. It evades the question taking recourse to a singularity. We must note that it is just a theory. It is an attempt to explain a physical phenomena using many postulates,
assumptions and a bundle of differential equations and integrals. No one can prove a theory. At best it can be verified. The latest I have read in Time magazine is that all the matter we have so far discussed is just 5% of matter in universe. Rest is all dark energy!!Getting complicated, I will leave it at that. Coming back to the question where we started, big bang is is no parallel worlds encounter.
2006-07-01 07:06:05 · answer #2 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah I watched those two Episodes on the Discovery Science Channel As well. The only problem with M~Theory is it doesn't bring us any closer to the "Theory of Everything" any more than the General Theory of Relativity does. It still becomes an ever reducing problem, like finding the the last 3 in the decimal for 1/3=.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
ad infinite . To find a point in Space/Time that one can call a creation event, then, one must assume there must be a Creator. oops! did I mention a Creator? Having Membranes Bounce off one another in an amorphous "11Th dimension" still ponders The point. How was this 11th Dimension created. Where did it come from. Something cannot be spontaneously created. There must all ways be a creating event. nothing evolves from nothing.
2006-07-01 02:44:41 · answer #3 · answered by Democestes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is alot of matter missing in the universe. Scientists can measure the mass but are missing the sources of the mass. I personally believe in "quintessence" (a book written by an author who slips my mind) which is a near weightless peice of adaptable energy. I believe personally that this dark energy exists both multi-dimensionally and operates much as a infant stem cell. This matter can be somehow transformed into a sun. The sun is mostly made of hydrogen and would explain why hydrogen is so abundant in the universe (as far as we know). When mass becomes great enough in a single point of space... space collapses into either a black hole or a gravstar. In the center of every galaxy is a super massive black hole. Personally I believe it is more of a giant star engulfed by dark energy. I think that dark energy is matter which exists in unilatteral dimensions... so it has form in some dimensions and not others. Radical Ideas? yes I agree but you can't say I don't take current theories and mold them into a good story.
2006-07-01 02:13:04 · answer #4 · answered by emtyen69 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the question is without meaning, the big bang is a logical outcome of current theory about universe but it is a singularity event and all theory breaks down, there is nothing on the other side of the big bang, no matter, no space or dimension, and no time so the answer is that there is no other side of the big bang so it can not be the aftermath of anything. and brane theory is still very speculative and mostly an attempt to deal with the idea of dark matter and gravity.
2006-07-01 01:45:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
why do you feel that the uni or multiiverses aren't finite?And how could either viewpoint be proved.How about looking the other direction...Inward. is that infinite? I guess I am just too thrilled to be sailing along on Spaceship earth..I like your ripple theory..
2006-07-01 01:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by tent trailer jack 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Membrane theory suggusts that if two membranes collide it might cause a Big Bang event.
http://www.mkaku.org/articles/mtheory_superstrings.shtml
2006-07-01 01:44:09 · answer #7 · answered by J_DOG 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was no big bang. God spoke and, it was. Don't believe the bull. As per your question, go back to sleep.
2006-07-01 01:41:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
you like to hear big bangs huh? go out and stand in traffic
2006-07-01 01:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you re-chew gum the next day?
2006-07-01 01:38:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋