2006-06-30 17:30:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Lacrosse is definately better! Word up!
2006-07-01 04:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
To whoever said hockey is more dangerous, this is FIELD hockey, not Ice Hockey. Field hockey is like soccer with sticks.
I've played both, and enjoy both. But Lacrosse is much better in my opinion, it is much faster and funner to watch. And to play requires more speed, strength and finer hand-eye coordination.
2006-06-30 18:37:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lacrosse is way better and only someone who had never played would say hockey is more dangerous.
2006-06-30 17:34:23 · answer #3 · answered by maigen_obx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me and my friends have been basically discussing this the different day. we are newcomers on our JV squad and had spent our entire 8th grade year going to classes, tumbling, conditioning, and despite else. To be a cheerleader takes actual expertise and ability. If we would have spent a similar volume of hours getting to understand a interest together with Lax, field Hockey, Volleyball, and so on. we could have been celebrity gamers. Do you think of as a lax participant, you need to are available and basically learn a roundoff backhandspring without previous adventure? Or a triple toe touch bounce without making a unmarried sound once you land? or maybe for that rely, grasp the proper cheer voice? No, so cheer takes greater uncooked expertise then different activities, plus a lot greater education and selection.
2016-11-01 00:42:10 · answer #4 · answered by jenniffer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hockey is better because its more dangerous
2006-06-30 17:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by benjamin linus 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What's the difference and who cares?
2006-06-30 17:44:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, they both suck!
2006-06-30 17:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by Balletbaby 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋