2006-06-30 17:20:54 · 6 answers · asked by the answer 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
recycling material is A. harder than what you get out of it and B it porduces green house gases that you know about and C it costs a **** load more than just dumping it in a land fill and getting thousands of years of methane out of it. and also why isn't there a no green house gases law, or no sex before your married law, or a morally correct law that bans gays from marrying (which i oppose) because this is America stupid, and i have a right to do with my garbage whatever the hell i want with it (except litter) YAY
2006-06-30 17:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by chuckles 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because how could it be enforced? would someone have to go around and dig through everyones trash cans to make sure there wasnt any recyclables in it? i believe in recycling and wish that more people would do it, but really there is no way to enforce such a law. however, they could make people pay for disposal of trash by weight, keep the recyclables separate, and they are free. that would be a good incentive to recycle.
2006-07-01 00:50:06 · answer #2 · answered by krystal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because people in general are very lazy and don't wanna take the time to recycle....this includes the law makers.
2006-07-01 00:22:58 · answer #3 · answered by silverelffairy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Recycling is actually pointless. It wastes more energy then it saves.
2006-07-01 00:22:35 · answer #4 · answered by Crazydog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is a local issue not a national issue. It doesn't fall under any of the provisions of the constitution.
2006-07-01 03:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because recycling is nothing more than a "feel" good program. It saves NOTHING
2006-07-01 00:47:28 · answer #6 · answered by scorpion 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋