yes, and he crumpled our world up, and threw it in a trach bin, just like you would do with a drawing that's way too old and did not turn out that good in the first place.
2006-06-30 15:56:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem to be struggling with how to describe a metaphysical concept in physical terms. Whether you believe in god or not, you will agree that a 'god' cannot be a physical being; the nature of godhood transcends the physical. So, does an additional dimension 'transcend' an existing set? Probably not. Imagine we are in Abbott's "Flatland", where the world is completely described by two dimensions. A three dimensional creature intersecting that world would still have a physical projection in that world, just not a full physical realization. Abbott explained this by showing the visitor, "A. Sphere", was perceived as a circle in flatland.
The god of the Judeo-Christians and most other modern religions is not limited to a projection, but is everywhere. Hence, that god transcends physics (is 'physical', or metaphysical, as in does not obey the laws of physics, as in miracles), and is not described by physics, no matter what the dimensionality.
2006-07-01 00:20:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Peter 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"god" and "God"
Many things in life you don't see but you feel. When you are happy or sad, when you hear music or when you are in silence.
"God" is in any dimensions greater or smoother than we can immagine just for a while.
And between this human concepts we count and we divide at the same time.
God could stay in adminesional point like a light.
"god" isn't what we imagine it could be "God" when we're thinking about that.
You could observe trees and imagine souls projection on the physical plane,
and another day you just watch yourself on the mirror asking where's your tree again.
God is that light which gives you insights when you want fly so high.
God is the love you gave for free when you let see the path more bright and pain so quiet.
"god" could contains "god" itself within all sets and be contained by zero again to vanish under the view of the universe of the no-sets.
As we think in limitied sets of of light, like crystall mirrors which no words could be so dense water nor pretend to describe,
God is like a circle or god like a square?
But not infinitive drops measure worlds will full the joy that God could breath inspires inside.
The eternal duality of human kind wants to feel in the air during the too busy life-time
and fall again to divide to survive, to survive.
2006-07-01 00:24:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by fedematico 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are not able to see an electron. We are not able to see air. Actually we are not seeing light; we perceive light, light has no color, the brain senses the color. We are not seeing sound, but we hear sound,
Every thing ends in brain. God is in ones brain. It is not a physical quantity to measure with the laws of physics.
There is no place for god in Physics. God is in the brain of religious minded people's brain.
2006-06-30 23:49:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pearlsawme 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're behind. Time is an established 4th demention. God does not exist. Nieschtze established that,"God is dead. We killed him." Nieschtze said ,"you'll know God when you meet Him, because he'll be the one who always has the last laugh."
2006-06-30 23:29:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ian Paul Freely 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
That sounds like a reasonable way of describing it. I have also said before, that we don't perceive God with our physical senses, but with our moral sense, which must be trained.
2006-06-30 23:05:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by cdf-rom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are as much as 11 dimensions and that means there are multiple universes,this is not some sci-fi **** but a proven mathematical concept...do you think the creator will limit himself to one dimension only? nah....its much more complicated and we have seen only "dimension" of the story ;)
2006-06-30 23:52:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by infinity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that man with his feeble minds cannot even begin to comprehend what the Creator truly is...
2006-06-30 23:14:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Masonic Knight 5
·
0⤊
0⤋