English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Typical rethuglican bias in the MSM. Neocons claim that liberals own the media, but their rabid, vile shills for the bush administration (O'Leilly, Limpbaugh, Hannity, Ingrateham, etc.) can say whatever they want and get a free pass, but god forbid Michael Moore, Alec Baldwin, Keith Olbermann, etc. say anything about dumbya, and it's treasonous. Hypocrites, all of you.

2006-06-30 15:45:06 · 15 answers · asked by whitesoxr1 2 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

The media endorses right wing fanatics because it is owned by right wing fanatics.

2006-06-30 15:48:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

There have already been a great number of Black and Hispanic communities insisting that the subsequent appointee could be Black, or could be Hispanic, in spite of skills. Why would not all people ever tell the proprietors of an NBA team that their next few contracts could flow to white basketball gamers (for the sake of "variety" for sure)? potential concerns!! i visit ascertain that if Obama possibilities a lady or a Black or a Hispanic, it's going to be because he surpassed over potential and skills. Obama cares no longer something about perfect reading the structure, he merely needs someone "who can empathize with a unfavorable lady". even even as Bush nominated Harriet Meiers each and absolutely everyone knew she became no longer the most qualified, yet Bush lied and publicly pronounced she became the most qualified, until eventually for sure he got here across John Roberts who became a lot extra qualified.

2016-10-14 00:35:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Fox news channel is fairly new. For years we had to put up liberal media and were not able to do anything about it. Now, we conservatives are able to hear "the real truth" thanks to people like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity etc. If you get a chance, check out a book called "Do as I say, not as I do". You might be surprised to find out some of things your "left" has been up to.

2006-06-30 15:55:24 · answer #3 · answered by sittin tight 3 · 0 1

Ann Coulter is the foremost iconoclast in America. An iconoclast is someone who:

1) Attacks and seeks to overthrow traditional or popular ideas or institutions.
2) Destroys sacred religious images.

She uses humor and sarcasm to open peoples' eyes to a different way of thinking. Mel Brookes always used humor to ridicule what he despised (such as Hitler) Ridicule is a powerful weapon. It exposes the huge flaws that we would otherwise not see.

Keep watching Ann Coulter. I think you'll realize what she is doing is sometimes tongue-in-cheek.

2006-06-30 15:55:08 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 1

Since when has Michael Moore stopped making stupid remarks? And since when do these supposed "Neocons" (what a dumbass word by the way) like Hannity get a "free pass"? You and all your hollywood worshiping friends condemn them, so what is the difference? you are a brilliant speller by the way

2006-06-30 15:51:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I am very worried about the amount of publicity she gets and how it is possible that her zealotry is accepted by so many people. She spews hateful and slanderous lies and her fans cheer her on. If this is a reflection of conservative thinking, I'm just not clear on what truly needs careful consideration in this life.

2006-06-30 16:03:07 · answer #6 · answered by rosedelano 1 · 1 0

I have always thought Ann Coulter was a Meth addict. She doesn't get a free pass, but is seen as the mad hatter more and more. Who owns the waves gets the voice.

2006-06-30 15:51:03 · answer #7 · answered by Larry Joe 1 · 1 0

Are you Maureen Dowd? The namecalling is top notch, worthy of the Times!

2006-07-07 06:34:17 · answer #8 · answered by smoot 3 · 0 0

Suggesting we poison a supreme court justice because we did not like his decision. OMG that is so funny, I cannot stop laughing.

2006-06-30 16:01:43 · answer #9 · answered by beren 7 · 1 0

It's kind of like watching a child do what a child will do. Let's not let them change the issue. That is their game.

2006-06-30 15:56:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because Ann's won the battle of ideas. Moore hasn't, can't and never will.

2006-06-30 16:04:57 · answer #11 · answered by libertyu9 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers