Will George Bush be impeached for lying about WMD's, destroying the environment and spying on Americans?

Answer 1

did you read the papers last week about finding wmds? is the American president the only one in charge of the environment or are we not all in charge of caring for the earth? and last but not the wire phone tabs was pass in 1994 and a federal court just upheld the decsion .also the next law was passed in Jan. 2000 not passed by this president.

http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/200001_us_fed_wiretap_laws.html

Answer 2

Please... he didn't "lie" about WMD's. They were there. Everyone believed they were at the beginning. Even Kerry. Saddam had some serious biological weapons which they've found evidence of. Also, I'm not sure how Bush single handedly destroyed our environment. It seems like everyone has a hand in that. And your vague accusation of bush spying on Americans is a little generalized. So, no, I don't think he'll be impeached. Sorry.

Answer 3

1) If you want to impeach Bush for WMD's please take out Hillary, Kerry, Kenedy and most of the Democrats in the House for agreeing with him.

2) Where has he destroyed an acre of environment and if you can point to one when did that become impeachable? I mean did you ask for Gores' impeachment for selling off his river rights to the big bad corporation? Or how about Billy Jeff for his real estate deal?

3) Spying on Americans? I assume you mean monitoring calls from areas of the world where terrorist work and live? I assume you mean trying to monitor the money movements of terrorist organizations - something the NY Times said the administration should do - right after 9/11 but then chastised him for doing it last week....

Pretty darn silly don't you think.

Answer 4

The real question you should be asking is, Why hasn't Ozzie Guillen been fired as Manager of the Chicago White Sox for using a slur against a gay man on TV. Bush will not get impeached no matter how much you off-base extremist liberals cry and moan(Most sane Liberals do indeed back Bush's efforts to fight terrorism). Seriously you sound like a parrot of Micheal Moore and his warped mind. I think Mr. Moore as a child was teased by people and his self esteem is pretty low so he has to attack others and make up baseless claims to make himself feel better. It's his brainwashing getting into your little mind that makes you think this way, perhaps when you grow up and learn to understand what's going on in the World, you'll realize Bush isn't the bad man. I bet you believe Bush caused Hurricane Katrina to hit New Orleans because he is a racist and you believe Bush was responsible for 9-11. Your blame Bush mentality makes you a mental midget in my mind. If you are going to ask this question at least provide factual proof of your allegations.( Micheal Moore's movie does not count)

Answer 5

What?!
Okay, the "lies" about WMD's were NOT lies. I have heard reports directly from soldiers who were THERE who have found evidence that there were recently WMD's. Somehow, they made it out of the country before we went in. Perhaps many of them were in those trucks leaving the country with orders from Saddam himself? Hmmm...
Destroying the environment? He is not, any more than any other president.
He is not "spying" on Americans. He must have an awful lot of time on his hands to do that. This so-called "spying/surveillance program" did not involve "spying" on everyone. Has your line been tapped recently? In order to know whether it has been or not, do you have any involvement with terrorists/al Qaida? If not, you have nothing to worry about.
No he is not going to be impeached. Because none of the "reasons" you stated are true.

Answer 6

Now, explain to me how Bush lied? He saw and acted on the same intel. reports that the rest of them did-and that includes Boxer, Pelosi. Kerry, Kennedy, Hitlery, etc. To lie, you must knowingly misrepresent or knowingly and intentionally falsify. A good example of this would be Clinton's statement "I did not have sex with that woman-Miss Lewinsky." That was a gross misrepresentation of facts. Clearly Mr Clinton knew, for a fact, that he had porked her. Certainly even some one like him would recall. Being given faulty intell-the same intell is not an impeachable offense. For that matter, neither is diddling an intern in the oval office. Lying about it under oath (purgery) is. And impeaching Bush wouldn't neccessarily remove him from office, which I am assuming is the desired outcome of all this. Clinton served his second term in full even after being impeached.

Bush destroying the environment? Single handed or is Cheney helping him out? I am sure Frist and Delay are in on it, too. The effort is no doubt being spearheaded by Condi.

Spying on Americans. You are being spied on all the time by corperations. When you use your credit card at Wal Mart, Belk, Best Buy, etc, all that data is stored, scrutinized, translated, conferred over, anylized, and is then used to target you to make you a better consumer to the corperations. But you are worried about the CIA tapping phone calls to Bullshitistan?

Seriously. We are at war and y'all are worried about a bunch of bs. You might need to get your head out of your anal cavities long enough to realize that if Islamic extremist succeed in their goal, abortion won't be an issue. free speech won't be an issue, civil rights won't be an issue, and if you go against them, bad hair days won't be an issue. The will gladly relieve you of your head.

Prioritize. What's more important to you?

Just sucks to be you, doesn't it?

Answer 7

NO!
Every one thought there were wmd's. That dictator refused to let the inspectors due their jobs, Don't forget the Gulf War and the scuds, What environment did he destroy? Catching the terrorist by monitoring foreign transactions isn't spying on Americans Why would any honest Americans care if they were listened to? Are you breaking any Laws? Any one with a scanner can hear your wireless phones and eaves drop on you. Emails are not as private as you think and anyone on yahoo can read all of this and every one else's answers and questions.

Answer 8

look, in case you deliver him to reformatory, then off is going your boy Obama, Kerry, and enable's no longer overlook Pelosi and Reid get a vacation too. Congress had sufficient opportunities to end the conflict, yet they did not. Why? because they comprehend it had to be finished. Bush made fools of the democrats on a normal foundation, so in the experience that they could deliver him away, they'd have finished it already. they could't... because HE did not wreck ANY guidelines! So, Obama shouldn't impeach himself and his treasonous great majority. in case you extremely favor to locate some real criminals, why do not you inspect the housing fall down. then you will locate how Clinton's fiasco just about brought concerning the fall down of the worlds monetary device. even as your at it, take a inspect what percentage "contributions" Franks and Dodds gained from the FM's. I continually locate it humorous even as liberals concentration in on something criminal, and thoroughly turn a blind eye to each of the corruption of their social gathering. I incredibly love how they're going to omit the tale of corruption and bribery, and concentrate on a republican sex scandal. Ever listen the tale of Joe Biden promoting his effect to benefit his youngsters genuine resources company? this is demanding to locate, notwithstanding it became everywhere earlier the election, and it purely went away in the course of the election. Yep, no corruption there.

Answer 9

Will the liberal media be sued for not reporting that WMDs were already Found? It doesn't fit their agenda to tell the people about what was found after they trashed Bush so much. It was briefly reported by the media, but never got the air time it deserved, nor did the media apologies to Bush for slandering him. Check into some other news services that are not owned by the liberals and you will find out they were found.

Answer 10

actually, the media should be impeached for not reporting the true finds of WMD and I guess that doesn't bother you at all that we don't vote on who decides what makes the news or not or that the truth not be hidden and that the media does whatever they want irresponsibly and answers to no one...what a true shame