What contributing factors are arecognizable today? What is the like replacement?
2006-06-30 15:07:56 · 4 answers · asked by Joseph B 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Superstring theory is being hammered by many different new physical obervations. Proponents keep adding one fudge factor after another to try to save the theory from sinking.
The big bang theory has taken a beating, lately, but not as bad as superstring theory.
Evolution is solid and has been so for more than 100 years. But three methods of Lamarkian evolution, at a molecular biology level have recently been discovered. Especially the second one.(methylationof genes, and microsatellite r.n.a. in sperm and the massive random insertion of a jumping gene sequence in neurological cells causing random cell diversity.).
Dan the Answers-man
2006-06-30 15:36:24 · answer #1 · answered by Dan S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I gotta go with superstring theory. Anything that requires all those dimensions when EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN PRETTY DARN BUTT SIMPLE so far, has to have something wrong with it.
Likely replacement? We will know it when we see it, and only when we see it will string theory be abandoned. Kinda like the luminiferous ether and unifed EM theory (and ether STILL hung on for decades after Maxwell.)
2006-07-01 00:16:39 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Quark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm hoping gravity, but it will probably be evolution, the big bang theory and all that. The foundation just isn't sound; "The universe exists, therefore it wasn't created." I can't explain a creator very well either, but at least it makes some sense!
2006-06-30 22:14:05 · answer #3 · answered by something'srotten 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
common sense, man the whole world is a example
lol
2006-06-30 22:11:54 · answer #4 · answered by futurehero5200 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋