We have 2 family names we're choosing from.
(we have the last name, duh)
1)Mike Rotck(From my wife's side) 2)Hugh Jass(my side)
2006-06-30 14:05:51 · 54 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Maybe Ben...
2006-06-30 14:09:29 · update #1
HUGH JASS, I love that. it's different!!!!
2006-06-30 14:09:18 · answer #1 · answered by comingofage03 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hugh Jass
2006-06-30 14:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by rhythmicjen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hugh Jass
2006-06-30 14:08:57 · answer #3 · answered by ☆BadNews☆® 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends if you want your son to have a more common name or not. I would personally opt for Mike. Not sure I like either of the family-for-middle-names though.
And by the way, Hugh Jass is not a good combination at all if you say it out loud. It sounds more like Huge A-...well..you know.
2006-06-30 14:10:00 · answer #4 · answered by Raven Ardent 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Mike Rotck sounds funny and Hugh Jass reminds me of huge A**. I think u and your wife should think of some more names and then ask again.
2006-06-30 14:22:43 · answer #5 · answered by lisachanel69 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Rotck is the best. I wouldn't name a child Hugh Jass....)(
2006-06-30 14:13:14 · answer #6 · answered by MissKathleen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hugh Jass is an AWESOME name
If he became famous that would go great EITHER WAY!
a rockstar, writer, producer or even something political
it's a great name that really stands out.
Mike is a great name both my husband and I have brother named mike...
but..."mike" doesn't sound very political or rockstar now does it :)
Go with Hugh Jass :)
2006-06-30 14:10:15 · answer #7 · answered by poopypants 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey Hugh Jass is cool.
2006-06-30 14:27:48 · answer #8 · answered by sqishieears 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really care for either of these names, I like Mike and I like Jass but don't get the Rotck (surname?) and Hugh, well, just don't care for it. But that doesn't matter at all. It's what you two like! I think sea of sapphire (Or whatever I kinda forgot and don't wanna go back to look)'s answer was quite clever and funny!
2006-06-30 14:10:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that the second one Hugh Jass is actually pretty nice. Go for it.
2006-06-30 14:09:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you combine , make it Michael Jass forget Hugh that's unique I'll grant but kinda old fashioned.
2006-06-30 14:11:39 · answer #11 · answered by red dragon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋