Global problems require global solutions:- how can this planetary civilization evolve without a One World Government (based on a fantastic constitution of peace love and understanding of course)...and I don't mean the United nations.
Who would hate this idea the most? What nations as we know them today would hate this idea the most.....
Do you think the average person (global average person that is) would agree to dismantle the militaries of all nations- so we could all live in peace and plenty?
Who wants war? and famine? and fear?
2006-06-30 13:39:56 · 8 answers · asked by mi22 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Are you kidding? would you like to have your life run by Somalis? or anyone from the middle east? c'mon have some sense.. .when the UN has countries like Syria on the human rights committee, we don't need a world government....
2006-06-30 14:23:58 · answer #1 · answered by jackmacaw 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's a great idea. Unfortunately, it will be a long time before this planet is ready for that. The cultural, language, economic, and religious differences are just too great. If you haven't traveled much outside your country, I recommend it. When you see how other people really live, and how their governments treat them, you begin to get the idea that their lives are nothing like ours.
I don't think the average person would support this now either. Everyone was raised in their culture, and with beliefs of the natural superiority of their ways of life. Trying to find a middle ground would be next to impossible. The rich countries would have to get a whole lot poorer, for example.
I think the one thing that could make this happen in the next 1,000 years would be contact with aliens from other planets. That would let us know how really small our blue planet is. I don't see that happening any time soon.
2006-06-30 20:55:01 · answer #2 · answered by Karl the Webmaster 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who would hate this the most...the newly reformed Christians. I say that because in the Bible a one world government only occurs after the rapture, so longtime Christians and any child alive before the rapture would be gone. So newly reformed Christians would hate the one world government because that is supposed to be how the Anti-Christ gains his power, first by leading as an elected leader, then taking control as if he were a god. So while theoretically this may sound like a good idea, it would start more wars than it would end.
2006-06-30 20:46:48 · answer #3 · answered by Crys H. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a nice ideal. Getting there would be extremely difficult.
People don't like change. People tend to distrust other people. Each person has his/her own agenda that they feel is best from their point of view. Each person would have a different opinion of what the world government should do, how it should operate, etc.
2006-06-30 20:47:34 · answer #4 · answered by wires 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No world leader would give up the power.
Most men want to be dictators or at least in charge.
Governor, chancelor, king, prime minister
Has to come with a title. Their importantce is the primary objective. Hell with peace, or lack of war.
What military comander would want world peace.
He would be out of a job.
2006-06-30 20:45:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a one world government is a good idea, however who would run it and how. Who is to say that we could even get along? Especially with different religions and beliefs, languages etc.
2006-06-30 21:01:03 · answer #6 · answered by Inquisitive1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world should get together and form a world counsil, why not, what we are doing now is not working. Look at the news
2006-07-07 16:05:15 · answer #7 · answered by charles w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean based on a US model, NO THANKS
2006-06-30 20:45:37 · answer #8 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋