David slew Goliath with a rock
2006-06-30 15:54:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by aughtnine 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
if you are are going to throw it at them, then yes. it is not likely that you would be in a position to stop a terrorist attack tho. at lest you are coming to the realization that you are responsible for your own safety, witch sounds like a step up from your uncle.
if you get a gun make sure, you learn the rules of safety with it, and have fun on the range.
2006-07-07 09:05:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by emclean 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
roflcopter, Get an AK-47, the 7.62 Round will kill in one or two shots and they're reliable no matter what kind of abuse you put them through.
As an additional bonus when World War 3 rolls around there will be a proliferation of 7.62 Chinese rounds which feature a mild steel core, sort of a Poor Mans' Armor Piercing round. Hope this helps!
2006-06-30 13:31:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by collegedebt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if they are dipped in pigs blood and can penetrate his skin, and keep him from pushing a detonator.
A head shot is the accepted way to keep a terrorist from being able to operate a detonator.
So your uncle is wrong.
2006-06-30 17:28:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by .45 Peacemaker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes your uncle is right but a gun is WAY more intimidating. So if dee revolution come don't forget your gun!
2006-06-30 13:30:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is right , they have to be pea gravel and loaded into a 12ga. shotgun reload casing. Good Luck...
2006-07-01 08:28:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by GUNSLINGER 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
go buy a gun and shoot him. He's a terrorist.
2006-06-30 13:29:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by whitetrashwithmoney 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
if all hell breaks loose im gettin a gun AND a helmet!! im not taking any chances!!!!
2006-06-30 14:59:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by ..... 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup, i like your uncle.
2006-06-30 13:28:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by nonyerbusiness 3
·
0⤊
0⤋