How can ANY conservative say Bush has done a good job with the economy?

Question

As with everything Dubya has done, there are a lot of gray areas (hell, it's ALL gray area), but the ECONOMY!!?? I actually had someone tell me that we are actaully better off economically with Bush than we are with Clinton. This person is a moron. So, please conservatives, just admit that, everything else aside. our economy is terrible. And we know where to place the blame.

Record low unemployment?????? someone please call that guy a liar.

Answer 1

Bush cuts taxes for the wealthy at the same time as his administration gets us embroiled in an unnecessary war, based on a pack of lies, that is costing us hundreds of billions every year. The cons like to say "tax and spend liberals", while their own so-called conservative administration is spending like drunken sailors. The deficit and debt have ballooned to record levels, the Fed has to keep raising interest rates to ward off impending inflation, foreign nations are buying up our securities so we can pay INTEREST on the debt, manufacturing jobs are going overseas, being replaced by low wage, no benefit service sector jobs..and STILL people think this country is on the right track??? How can ANYONE be that stupid?

Answer 2

Maybe because the economy is in good shape.

The only reason the economy was booming under Clinton was because of the invention of the INTERNET and other stuff like that. That's why the economy was booming, not because of Clinton's economic policies.

By the way, check out this article from The Herald (UK) on May 8, 2006:
The United States is enjoying the sort of blistering economic growth that most European countries crave. The US economy recorded a trend-busting 4.8% in the first quarter of 2006 despite elevated oil prices and higher interest rates. Meanwhile, the UK and the rest of Europe are grinding hard just to get back up to their long-term trend growth of around half that pace.
US consumers are still spending and the labour market is as near to full employment as you can hope to get. They are also achieving productivity growth rates that put ours [UK] to shame.

Answer 3

Well lets see netjr...Chinese economy kicking our culo up and down the street, beyond record deficits, national debt that cant be paid...I would keep going with the truth but the truth really hurts you conservatives, that's why when there is a debate you guys scream over top of everybody else. I dread the day when my grandchildren have to start carrying Mao's little red book because the conservatives outsourced everything to China.

Answer 4

Oh no, you're not fooling me. There have been ten thousand of these topics in different places, all about different things. The environment, taxes, it's all been done before. Eventually, one republican in each topic will admit it, then guess what? Better stock up on the ink, buddy, cause every single one of those topics is going to be printed out on one 10,000 page document with the heading, "Now even Conservatives turn against themselves!!!11!!Shift+1!!11!"

You say it won't happen, look at all of the other things that liberals (not all of them) have done.

Answer 5

first of all clinton was just riding the coat tails of regan, all so clinton's biggest thing was that he created the biggest surplus in like 50 or 70 years or something like that, ya because he shut down a lot of military bases! trust me clinton was not a great president, however being a conservative, i will say that bush is even worse, i know you are going to hate what i say next, but i do agree with bushs' foreign policy, but i can't stand him fiscally. here is what bush did in a nutshell and please tell me if you agree. first he changed the bankrupcy laws , pretty much saying if you made over 40 grand last year you can not file bankrupcy, then he says that companies do not have to pay time and a half to their employees if they choose not to do so, then he allows all the jobs to move overseas so thousands of people get laid off, so now he has made all the rich even richer he has lost sight of the big picture that he has completely damaged consumer confidence, and now they can't afford their homes , cars, etc.... and now like i said before the people can not file bankrupcy to have some relief, fiscally bush has set up the average man to fail, so in my mind every blue collar worker dosen't have a prayer and certainly no security, i do call myself a conserative, however at times i would say that i'm fiscally liberal, although lets not get crazy i mean if liberals had it all we would have to give up 70 percent of our paychecks, sorry my answer is long winded, i would say that in the end i do agree with you, except for the rich it is extremely high times for them, i would like to talk more about this with you if you'd like, you can get me at jmacleod1980 at the the hoo........

Answer 6

Oh lets see; record low unemployment, continual low interest rates, record GDP growth, low inflation despite high energy costs, stock market near record highs....yeah I know it hurts you that the country is actually going in the right direction, but the truth is we can't afford having you mess it up.

--- edit ---

If you don't like the answer don't ask the question and do not call me a liar if you do not know the facts.
http://www.bls.gov/home.htm

FACT BJ CLINTON's lowest Unemployement rate was 5% and todays' is 4.6%. So who is the idiot asking the question that is the liar?

Answer 7

Yes, you're right...I mean left...the economy is terrible. It's so bad that unemployment went DOWN like a presidential intern. It's so bad that John Edwards is going to have to sue someone again to make up for his losses. It's so bad that liberals might aactually have to keep some promises and give some money to the poor. Yes, it's terrible.

Answer 8

if you're in the high levels of the economy, like running an oil company... things are better than ever... all the upper level tax cuts and grants... WOHOO!!

so, that is where they are getting that...

but the vast majority of America isn't even getting "trickled on"... the upper level "success" skews all the numbers, so that they look decent... but they still aren't as good as Clinton's... especially if you factor in INFLATION...

netjr: IT'S NO WHERE NEAR RECORD LOWS FOR UNEMPLOYMENT... I TELL YOU THIS EVERY TIME AND POST LINKS? I GIVE UP...
INTREST RATES HAVE BEEN RISING, RISING AND RISING... IN AN ATTEMPT TO FIGHT INFLATION... WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
EVERYTIME BERNAKE OPENS HIS MOUTH THE MARKET DROPS 200 POINTS..

This is from your site... it clearly lists Clinton's low at 3.9 in what seems to be Oct. of 2000... that is all I am going to say...

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

Answer 9

1- Stock market is basically back to it's highest levels. It began to tank under Clinton.
2- Unemployment is at Clinton levels
3- Home ownership is at the highest it has ever been.
4- I am richer than ever.
5- How is all this improvement workin' out for you?

Answer 10

Now for something else of the tale you have not been instructed by your Liberal acquaintances. Hoover, won't be able to assert a lot. contained in the previous due 70's, the country became locked in stagnation. This became by using irresponsible economic coverage (printing money or "criminal" counterfeiting) for years. Carter genuinely tried to reign it in, yet right now sponsored off. even as Reagan got here in, he had the heart to allow the Fed and Paul Vokler do what they needed to do to reign contained in the money furnish. It damage. prices of activity soared and a recession ensued. It became notwithstanding needed to break the habit to printing money. the country went notwithstanding detox, yet in '80 3 got here out sparkling and sober. This created the inspiration for a good monetary device for the subsequent 17 years. earlier you attempt to ding him on spending, keep in recommendations there became a chilly conflict with the Soviets occurring. After fixing the monetary device, he became waiting to apply the monetary device itself as a weapon. He opened a sparkling the front on the monetary battlefield, a options a lot less bloody. He outspent them into oblivion. Frankly, the quantity of debt became deemed workable. It wasn't until eventually the spending of G. W. Bush (even earlier TARP) human beings, including Conservatives, began to comprehend there became too a lot on the mastercard. The G. W. Bush monetary device wasn't undesirable, besides the actual incontrovertible reality that it wasn't great both. The spending became an difficulty. What presented the domicile down became the fall down of the sub-excellent loan market. What fueled this became Democratic pressure and arm-twisting for banks (including Fannie and Freddie) to settle for further of those risky mortgages than they wanted. They did this to look like heroes to their substances who were searching for low fee lower priced housing. Wall highway greed performed a component by accepting those noticeably risky loan-back securities, in straight forward words seeing the income to be received and not in any respect the possibility. Bush became conscious there became a topic as previous due as 2005. His sin became now to not comprehend the problem or practising "do not rock the boat" politics. The Democrats and Wall highway pushed the vehicle over the cliff and Bush watched.