English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush's economic policies have made our economy better than it was in the nineties. This is in terms of job security, decreasing unemployment rates, and rising stock prices.

2006-06-30 12:30:27 · 22 answers · asked by drQuiggles 2 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

I would vote for him again in a heartbeat! I believe he is a president that has had to make tough decisions and has the will to follow through with them. Since when has Americas resolve been a turn and run policy? The questions I have is for all the libs out there. Where would we be if we always in history turn and ran when facing tough decisions? What if because of human sacrifice we turn and ran in the Revolutionary War, The Civil War, WW1,and WW2? I would be honored if my 3 boys served their country! What happens after that is in Gods great hands. I served and my grandfather served and fought for this country.

2006-06-30 12:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by maxxspeedist 3 · 1 1

Are you nuts? What have you been reading that Bush has done good things for the economy? Turn off your Laptop get in your car and drive about 300 miles in any direction. People are out of work, have less security than ever before and its the Big companies that continue to send our jobs to China. No I would not vote for Bush again!! Hilary...Great Woman but the USA is not ready for a female President yet.

2006-06-30 12:49:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YOU ARE HIGH!!!! where did you get these FALSE economic, unemployment and rising stock numbers from? What a looney!
I've never voted for BUSH....I never WILL!!!!! he is SCUM!!!
I can't wait until he is OUT of office so that I can Proudly display the "Stars and Stripes" once again! I refuse to display the American Flag Under the Bush administration.....he doesn't deserve it! He has not earned it! The bush administartion is a DISGRACE!!!!!!!

2006-06-30 12:36:42 · answer #3 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 0 0

i think of George Bush is the worst President we've ever had. His father is a greater proper guy or woman and out classes his son. even though i think of he replaced into no longer a reliable President the two, it looked as though it may start up the mean, prejudice, corrupt, theocratic politics we ought to continually a optimum immediately. I dont realy think of our united states can final yet another 4 years of Bush's administration and policies. extremely the only human beings greater proper off are his friends and the excellent rich, yet it puzzles me that some human beings 27% nonetheless like him even however he does issues against their pastimes.

2016-11-01 00:28:08 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He would win again,..he tore up Kerry, he would do the same to Hillary..Folks, Charles Manson could run in 08 and beat whoever the dems throw at him.Thier party is dead, that was proven the LAST election.Untill they can come up with a candidate that appeals to EVERYONE,not just the farrr left liberal lunatics, they are toast.The republicans has 2 guys by the names of John Mcain and Rudy Gullianini that do just that

2006-06-30 12:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0 0

They're out of Tampax in the White House, so I'd vote for Al Gore. Why? because I rather have someone enforcing tough environmental laws than some d*** head drilling for more oil in the world and cutting deals with Al Quaeda. Period.

2006-06-30 12:56:16 · answer #6 · answered by reinaldo.martinez 1 · 0 0

Wow, you must be reading those numbers upside down.

The economy was in far better shape in the 90s almost across the board in every measurable category. The government was much, much smaller, we were running a surplus (thanks to Democrats and Republicans making the tough budget choices) and we weren't giving money away to the rich and connected.

I wouldn't mind Bush running again (Hilary won't run--you heard it hear first). He needs to have the final nail in his political coffin--the mandate to go home.

2006-06-30 12:34:29 · answer #7 · answered by PermDude 4 · 0 0

If necessary I would vote for snoopy the dog instead of Hillary. Even Bill knew she was just taking up space but now she is the golden child of the dummycrats.

2006-06-30 12:58:16 · answer #8 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0 0

I'd vote for just about ANY ONE ELSE who was running against Hillary. The idea of her in the white house is frightening.

God help us all if she were to run and win. Hell would have arrived on earth.

2006-06-30 12:35:08 · answer #9 · answered by cliffinutah 4 · 0 0

I would vote for Hillary's opponent any day. I wouldn't elect that bit*h for dog catcher, let alone President of our country.

2006-06-30 12:34:50 · answer #10 · answered by rockinout 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers