Okay so the guy had a problem with the barn door staying closed.
But aside from his personal follies, which just happened to be in the public eye, what did you think of his presidency and why?
2006-06-30 12:28:36 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, I love that guy! Well, not really LOVE him, but you know what I mean! LOL. I really thought he was a great president myself.
2006-06-30 12:32:30 · answer #1 · answered by prettypixie1997 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't know about everyone, but I prefer a President with wisdom and self-control. Bill Clinton does not fit into either one of these categories as evidenced by his "personal follies." So no, I wouldn't vote for him again.
2006-06-30 12:42:27 · answer #2 · answered by trinitytough 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! He should have finished his job in Iraq, instead of having Bush finish it! Gas was affordable? ARE U SERIOUS?! Um... it seems to me like Clinton being president has nothing to do with gas prices. As far as most honest? Well he tried to cover the Monica thing... but um... we all know what happened there. As far as Hilary I think she is a fake ***** who is pretending to care about babies so people will think she has morals (which she doesn't) so she can win the next election.
2006-06-30 13:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by Rachel :) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would. I feel that he was wrong in having the affair with Monica and that this wasn't the best example for our country. He could have been more tasteful with that too. His public life, however, was great. A booming economy, budget surplus, and a small unemployment rate. He also gave more resources for people to escape poverty.
There is much more to say about him, including his scandal and lies in comparison to Bush.
2006-06-30 13:23:54 · answer #4 · answered by natobanato2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lied under oath, sold nuclear technology to the highest bidder, allowed the economy to be ARTIFICIALLY inflated, bombed Sudanese aspirin factory, bombed Yugoslavian civilians, didn't take Bin Laden when offered, ignored Oklahoma city evidence that showed foreign involvement, killed many innocent Americans at Ruby Ridge and Waco (thanks Janet Reno), Made a mockery of the presidency, treated terrorism as a police matter, etc etc etc...
His affinity for chubby girls was the least of his transgressions.
2006-06-30 12:48:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell Yeah I would you know if Hilary runs I'll vote for her and it will kinda be like he is president again Cause you know they had pillow talk all the time when he was president and Hilary gave him advice. So if she won he would be back there is still a chance people if she runs vote for her she couldnt mess up anymore than Bush what a ******* joke that MF is
2006-06-30 12:50:04 · answer #6 · answered by JustMe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Clinton was a good man, sure he fell into the american way and lowerd himself but he did do a good job. He built alot of bridges. And for the Gas and Job situation our current President did not make them choices. Business's have been leaving the US for the past 10 years, and Gas prices...guess what..they are set higher and higher for individual profits. (President bush sold his oil company's stock he's not profiting) But I do not feel Clinto would be good back in office.
2006-06-30 12:34:04 · answer #7 · answered by ashtonw05 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slick Willy got up in front of the American public and LIED!!!! And the American people still re-elected him. That's a good example of just how self-centered and selfish most of the people in this nation have become, and one of the main reasons the glory days of the United States are long gone.
2006-06-30 13:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good Lord no way. Still wonder if Hilliary ran if Bill could be VP, was told that they candidates can't be from the same state but with those two I'm sure they can fix it. I mean really how many days did Hilliary live in NY before she ran for Senate?
2006-06-30 12:45:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he might have a chance if it weren't for people's ideas of a leader being confused with their ideas of what a leader's personal life should be. He made a mistake, and that mistake did show poor judgment and character, so I would not elect him, though I wouldn't elect someone who was adamant about waging wars against anyone who has weapons either.
2006-06-30 12:34:53 · answer #10 · answered by too_live_forever 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance.
He took a good economy and ruined it.
He gave the Chinese military secrets.
He destroyed the military.
He destroyed the intelligence community.
He planted extremist activist judges through the courts.
He did nothing for fuel economy.
He did nothing for the environment.
He pissed on the second amendment.
He did nothing worthwhile.
2006-06-30 12:40:48 · answer #11 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋