It's wonderfully written
It's deeper than it seems on the surface, leaving it to be interpreted in multiple ways, letting people see it how they want to
The character(s) are three dimensional, deep, and lifelike
It seems childlishly written , addng to the over all illusion of the book. A novel doesn't have to be written in shakepearian language to be well written.
The title...think about it. a rye feild with children in it. he wants to be a catcher in the rye. save the children. religious allegory...?
2006-06-30 11:14:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by allie <3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok, first of all, I choose to read some of the classics I missed in school just for fun (either that or I'm just plain crazy). I read it and I too, cannot for the life of me understand why it's so highly rated. The title refers to the line from an old hymn that he kinda got mixed up in his head, "If a body meet a body comin' through the rye." He thought it was "If a body catch a body comin' through the rye..." Sort of shows how he is convinced things are a certain way, but they're not. As far as significance and fame, hey, got me! It's one of the worst books I have EVER read!
2006-07-07 10:49:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by MindaLarie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too Kill A Mockingbird by utilizing Harper Lee (which became also a actual movie classic with Gregory %.), is a superbly written tale and under no circumstances too "wordy" contained in the way some classics will be. that is not any longer too lengthy both meaning it would grant you with adequate time to soak up it extra totally and with any success go away time to spare to ascertain a second classic. For a second decision i'd %. something like delight & Prejudice by utilizing Jane Austen, even as I agree distinct the others would nicely be somewhat extra twisty, this one is a sturdy examine and delivers a lot room for prognosis of sophistication, manners and the emphasis positioned on women being married etc. back there are distinct seen interpretations that would nicely be watched too, from the hit BBC version, back to an previous, classic with Laurence Olivier taking area in Mr. D'Arcy. That on my own supplies a thread of why this plot is so time-honored that merely about each and every technology has felt the want to interpret it, there could be some relevance felt. you may want to question why the D'Arcy personality has stood the try of time, it may't all be all the way down to Colin Firth and a moist blouse, can it?! strong success any way, with in spite of you %..
2016-10-14 00:24:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not banned anymore normally but b/c of it's underage s*ex talk and cussing (f-word) it was like 40 yrs. ago. I think it's awesome, it's my favorite. It's not hard to understand. "a catcher in the rye" means someone who is in childrens dreams or something like that, it's explained toward the end of the book. If you still think you don't like it, go to sparknotes.com to get a better understanding of it. Holden is just like me even though I'm female, I'll def be reading it again!
2006-07-01 13:12:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by . 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's considered a great portrayal of teen angst. If you read it, you should have noticed Holden's description of standing at the edge of the cliff with children running at him out of a rye field, and he has to catch them and keep them from falling off. The book is famous because copies of it are found on almost every famous assassin. Watch the movie Conspiracy Theory with Mel Gibson for an interesting take on this fact.
Note: the CIA permanently flags your name if you purchase it or check it out at the library.
2006-06-30 11:14:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by drumrchick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It explains the title in the book. The guy explains that in his dream he felt like a catcher in the rye. Rye is a plant. it grows in fields, kind of like wheat.
2006-06-30 11:14:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guessed the ending correctly. I don't know why it's one of the best but it is enjoyable. Reading if for learning different things. Not everybody likes the same thing.
2006-06-30 11:21:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by MS_shirley 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the catcher int he rye is considered so good, beause it is well written, it shows so well the sensitivity of teenagers, it's a masterpiece, one of my favorite books!
2006-06-30 11:33:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by powerpuffgirl_2332 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've read it too and I have to agree with you. I found it dull and drawn out. The characters were not interesting and difficult to relate to.
2006-06-30 11:16:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I couldn't stand that book! I had to stop reading it. It sounds like it was written by a second grader...so I wouldn't know.
2006-06-30 11:12:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by anonymous 2
·
0⤊
1⤋