Funding Solutions to Human Fertility VS Funding Human Population Control?

Question

Ethical and Social Issues: Infertility And Assisted Reproduction

I am trying to figure out 3 merits of funding Solutions to Human Fertility VS Funding Human Population Control? This is for Bio 12 but not really biology.

Answer 1

Human fertility funding will assure that those people willing to go to great lengths to have a child will be among the ones populating the world. These people will be more likely to provide advantages to a child, which will make it a more productive citizen.

With the falling rates of fertility in industrialized nations, the rate of reproduction will be much higher in poorer nations, therefore reducing the ratio of well-educated to poorly educated people, leading to an overall decline of quality of life worldwide. With fertility research, this ratio will be improved. (Doesn't mean those people will help anyone else, but it's a decent argument anyway.)

Those two are the only ones I can come up with off the top of my head. You've got a tough position to support, but, as Rob Schneider says, "You can do eeeet."

Answer 2

I think the Earth is becoming VERY crowded. It leads to poverty, misery, and pollution. If people who choose not to have any kids can be helped in doing that, I think that is most important.

I think people who want them should be able to try to have them too.

Answer 3

no longer certain how this would or might want to help. yet supposedly some places round huge cities pay really. the persons considered scum,(i.e. drug consumers, whores, alkies, etc) to be sterilized. this can be one of those inhabitants administration. although you would possibly want to inspect hitler's version of eugenics