The entire world cannot be governed by one person.Even if the masses elect him it would not be a good idea to have the world governed by a single person.
2006-06-30 07:40:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eternity 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No because there is too many religions and beliefs, if they had a vote by the masses then whoever was the ambassador for the east indian nations or for the oriental nations would win because they have the greatest percentage of the masses.
2006-06-30 14:41:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by hoothootwaa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, the AntiChrist. This is the Biblical prophecy for the end of the world as we know it.
2006-06-30 14:41:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by bbcranks 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um yeah that's working real well here in the USA dont you agree?
Give me a break, half will hate him and half will love him.
Even Jesus didn't want to be a king, who wants the headache.
Vote for the one that dont want it, the ones who do are the monsters.
2006-06-30 14:45:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by eg_ansel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The antiChrist will rule the world.
2006-06-30 14:42:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by robert p 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't trust the discretion and intelligence of my fellow man to select that one person.
2006-06-30 14:42:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he delegates appropriately (You're in charge of Eruope, you get North America) then supervises his delegates.
2006-06-30 14:41:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by DonSoze 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL! Two of the people answering posted crap about the 'anti-Christ'. It's AMAZING how self-deluded people can get...
2006-06-30 14:45:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hell you cant get a city goverment together to work well ... a world goverment??? put down the crack pipe
2006-06-30 14:41:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by X-Rider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way. Hitler tried that, and failed.
2006-06-30 14:42:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Karen_momof4 3
·
0⤊
0⤋