Who should have won MVP this year in Nba?

Question

From what has happened this year, who should have really won MVP and why? I thought it should have been Kobe Bryant cuz he lead the Lakers to the playoffs single handed

Answer 1

Kobe. Doesn't anyone on this site watch any games...it's pretty obvious... He won the scoring title by about two points while being constantly double teamed.

Answer 2

Kobe b/c his supporting cast was worst than Nash's, Lebron's, Wade's, and Dirk's. Kobe had a couple of guys on his team that had oft-spoken names - Odom and Kwame Brown - but names can't play basketball for you. Brown's name is heard a lot b/c he is a recovering scrub. He showed some signs of life toward the end of the season, but I'd still rather have Ilgauskas or Gooden as a teammate over Brown. Odom had a very inconsistent season. Many times, he just didn't show up. Like in game 7 vs Phoenix. So, for the guy that said Lebron had a worst supporting cast. Honestly, who would you rather have around you - Smush Parker, Lamar Odom, Luke Walton, and Kwame Brown or Eric Snow, Larry Hughes, Drew Gooden and Zydrunaus Ilgauskas?

Answer 3

Definitely the man who got it, Steve Nash. MVP stands for Most Valuable Player-and that's exactly what Nash was. If you told me that the Phoenix Suns would make it to the Western Conference Finals after losing Joe Johnson and Quentin Richardson, and having Amare Stoudamire go down for the year, I'd have said you were crazy. Steve Nash turned Boris Diaw and Raja Bell into great players in just one year. Take Nash off that team and the Suns wouldn't even sniff 30 wins.

Answer 4

All Kobe does is take 80% of his teams shots. Only like 13 teams don’t make the playoffs so leading your team to the playoffs isn’t anything special. I think the MVP should go to the person who ranks the best in Rebounds, steals, assist, points, minutes, wins and makes his teammates better. Cause that is what Steve Nash did he makes his teammates better because he is on the team.

Answer 5

Even though Steve Nash is good, I'm with you. MVP stands for most valuable player, and Kobe was definatly the most valuable player to his team, more than anyone else was. Nash has a good supporting cast with Stodemire and crew. Kobe has nothing.

Answer 6

Its determined by those contained in the agency, analysts, writers, etc. there is not any longer any criteria, it really is punctiliously subjective. If it change into purpose, it does no longer want balloting, a operating workstation or computing gadget might want to teach you a thanks to already comprehend. traditionally, it truly is a participant for a set who has received extra effectual than 50 video games, then the finals mvp is diverse. that's it, debate all day. Why 2 mvps? Season and finals? i imagine of it really is an admission that the guy they vote for Season MVP received't make it to the Finals, to that end they vote decrease back.

Answer 7

I think d wade won the MVP award fair and square with his talent and determination that lead the heats to victory!! Dwyane Wade deserved that MVP hands down!!

Answer 8

I thought that LeBron James should've won it because of his teams accomplishments. His supporting cast was worse than the Lakers and he got his team further. Just an opinion.

Answer 9

i think they should pick the MVP after the playoffs are over like they do in the NHL. That way it woulda been either Dirk or Dwayne "Fall-Down" Wade.

Answer 10

Kobe
over 35 ppg isdeserving of mvp.
withouth himm the laers would not win 15 games