Or would you at all, if given the opportunity, and no chance of imprisonment?
2006-06-30 05:28:29 · 21 answers · asked by maryeforeman 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i think if we killed any one of these guys someone else just would have filled their places in history
2006-06-30 05:46:02 · answer #1 · answered by ben s 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler
2006-06-30 12:34:11 · answer #2 · answered by Steve 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler
2006-06-30 12:31:19 · answer #3 · answered by suheilly13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you knew the way things really went, you wouldn't ask such things. Saddam Hussein, for example, was not the "bad guy", until certain people decided he should be ousted. But that was just a pretext to war and invasion, because the Iraqis are domiciled above valuable sources of petrol and the Zionists directing the U.S. government decided that American troops should fight their enemies, for them. (Y'know, Zionist Israel vs. Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc.)
Hitler was partially financed by Americans. He was also pro-Zionist.
Osama bin Laden was available for capture a long time ago, but those in charge pretend he's an enemy and ever-elusive, so those who profit from war can have it their way...
Furthermore, God never gave us permission to bring about a perceived good, by the commission of an evil act.
2006-06-30 12:42:41 · answer #4 · answered by mrearly2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
saddamm, sad to say we needed hitler to open the worlds eyes to the atrocites that can happen. Also WW2 did alot to unite the allies. You know in the 50's and 60's no one in the world would have said something bad about america. now look at us. saddamm if killed would have hoefully left iraqu in a democratic state and terrorist would not be there roaming around for so many years. All that oil money could have been used to make everyone a high end middle class like alberta canda does with it's oil
2006-06-30 12:42:52 · answer #5 · answered by chucky w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
how about all 3
2006-06-30 12:31:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler.
2006-06-30 12:50:20 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough choice but I've got to go with Hitler. To this point, he was responsible for more death.
mrearly2 - Keep drinking the Kool Aid!
2006-06-30 12:56:42 · answer #8 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler. All are bad, but the death rate on Hitler out-weighs the others.
2006-06-30 12:31:42 · answer #9 · answered by jabbamonkey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadilterama. I would mix them all together with some sort of acidic ooze and with the same armor peircing bullet shoot them all in the head, it would be a shot to the heart but since they have and had no heart it would be pointless.
2006-06-30 16:01:09 · answer #10 · answered by easyskaten 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OSAMA
my brother is in the marines so this war has had a big effect on my life and a lot of my friends have gone over there so it has impacted my life tremedously.
God bless our troops and bring them home safe
2006-06-30 12:34:16 · answer #11 · answered by roonie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋