who agrees with me that steve mcnair is washed up??

Question

how many rings does he have..............0

if he's such a warrior why is he on the DL so often

Answer 1

I still watch Super Bowl 34 when the Rams whooped the titans ***. I have the game on tape. As for Mcnair being washed up, hes injured too often. I like him in Baltimore.

Answer 2

He's not exactly washed up as he is injury-prone. He still has the same mechanics, same mobility and still the arm/heart in the game. He is a warrior, he tries to play no matter what but that's taken its toll. Keep in mind, once Eddie George slowed down; the Titans have been struggling ever since. This is still not a good team but at least they look to be rebuilding now with Volek/Young.

You ask then why is he always on the DL? Well this ain't baseball so I am unaware of a "Disabled List" but I've never seen him on IR. He's body has taken so much punishment that it's insane. I really find it hard to believe he can still walk down stairs effectively but he still can be a top-QB.

Since when did SB rings make someone washed up? Peyton Manning doesn't have one, I guess he's washed up for good. I guess the same could be said for Marc Bulger, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Tim Hasselbeck, Brooks Bollinger among others.

Answer 3

I don't ever recall a time when he wasn't. He was over-hyped when he came out of Alcorn State, he was overhyped when he entered the league, and he's overhyped now just to get his name in the paper. He's big, he can run, he can throw...so what? Unless you're running an option attack, your quarterback shouldn't be selected based on run ability. I'm sick of this "dual threat" era of quarterback. All it tells me is that the O-Coordinator is weak and can't get the 11 players on his side of the ball to do what they are supposed to do. You'd think at the NFL level that everyone on offense could play their assignments and be successful with it. Still, people keep ranting and raving about how great it is to have a QB with speed. It's not doing the Atlanta Falcons any good, and they've probably got the fastest QB in the NFL. It's pretty basic...if you know the QB can't complete a pass to save his life, you go man on the receivers and leave 7 in the box, which means your running game turns to zilch.

Give me 7 hogs up front and a good fullback any day, and you'll get a good offense.

Answer 4

He's a warrior because he plays through the pain he's on the injury report, no dl in football because his team is never in the running so he sits out the last few games trying to heal his body, but yea he's pretty much washed up.

Answer 5

He was a very good QB when he came out of college and his first few years with the Titans, but he's just taken a pounding the last few years. He's pretty much washed up, but when you're the Ravens and you have Kyle Boller, he probably looks good to you.

Answer 6

NOT WASHED UP HE IS A LITTLE OLD FOR A QB BUT NOT WASHED UP IF I WERE A OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR AND NEEDED TO WIN AND HAD THE MONEY TO SPEND I WOULD TAKE MCNAIR FOR A YEAR OR TWO HE IS GOOD FOR IT!! AND AS FAR HIS INJURIES HE IS LIKE ANY OTHER 34 OR 35 YEAR OLD QB WHO DID NOT HAVE GOOD OL THE LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS HE GOT BEAT UP!!!!

Answer 7

He's got the same amount as Manning, Vick, Hasselbeck, and a horde of other QB's in the league. He's a warrior, period. One of the toughest guys to ever play the game, at any position.

His skills have declined, but I think he will play well in Baltimore. He has Derrick Mason, Mark Clayton, and Todd Heap to throw to, as well as 2 hammers in the backfield with Lewis and Anderson. As long as the O-Line gives him time, he will put up good numbers. 3500 yds, 24 tds.

Answer 8

Even if he is on the other side of the mountain, he is still a better option than Kyle Boller

Answer 9

I agree

Answer 10

disagree

He will have a good year in Baltimore