that made you believe he did it? Keep in mind NO weapon was ever found.
2006-06-30 04:31:25 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
DNA
2006-06-30 04:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by Laura 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That smug look on his face...LOL but really, I think he was involved, but not the sole participator.
May I add this one thing: My father who at the time of the murders was not much older than O.J. came home one day with blood running all down his arm. When asked how he did it, he said, "I'm not sure how that got there." So if you recall, O.J. didn't remember where he got the cut on his finger. Therefore, I just want to state that this is an actual possibility. He may not have known how he got it. Yes there are other stipulations and so on but I wanted to throw that in.
Also, I think MS. MARCIA acted so "desperate" towards the jury that it was hard to take her seriously. That's why the jury didn't take her accusations into consideration. She acted like a kid begging for candy or in this case a conviction. How can you take that seriously? It's like taking Kato Kaelin seriously.
2006-06-30 11:42:32 · answer #2 · answered by mojogirl2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that case was lost by the prosecuting attorney's office from the start. From right when Marcia Clark (I believe it was her) in her opening statement actually apologized for having to bring him to court. Gee if you are so convinced that he is guilty then why apologize? From that point forward there was a big doubt in the minds of the jurors because of that apology. So no amount of evidence would erase her act of stupidity.
2006-06-30 11:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by Julie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Id have to say the blood all over his truck
The fact that he tried to run afterwards
His history of abusing her
Need any more MAIN pieces of evidence?
2006-06-30 11:36:34 · answer #4 · answered by snakeman11426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blood stains all over his Bronco, running from the police, the fact that there is no other logical killer, the glove that would have fit if blood hadn't dried up and made it shrink. Not to mention he just looks shady too.
2006-06-30 11:34:42 · answer #5 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well in my criminal investigations class I came to the conclusion with others that "IF THE GLOVE DOESN'T FIT, YOU MUST AQUIT". That was a major mistake by the prosecution to have him try on the glove, it represented a huge turn in the case.
2006-06-30 11:56:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being seen by the limo driver sneaking in to his own house dressed in all black right after the murders were comitted.
2006-06-30 11:37:45 · answer #7 · answered by bigsetzerfan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blood in the bronco "no weapon was found"?? it was a knife how hard would it be to get rid of?? he even convinced himself he didn't do it
2006-06-30 11:36:54 · answer #8 · answered by remy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The insane odds that his blood was found on the scene and couldn't possibly be anyone else's.
2006-06-30 11:36:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The trial's over, who the fvck cares?
2006-06-30 12:05:02 · answer #10 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
since i don't believe he did it my answer may not make sense but it had to be all the pictures of the blood spatter everywhere on the sidewalk.... because it sure wasn't the gloves!
2006-06-30 11:34:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋