2006-06-30 03:57:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
the "war on terror" is not a real war.
it is like the "war on crime" you CAN'T BEAT THEM!
as for bush, he should have been impeached after his first day in office. Al Gore won the 200 presidential election.
Bush is a war criminal.
his administration has openly totured people without giving them a fair trial, or even lawers.
he lead a pre-emptive war on false information, which he KNEW was flase before he made the announcement.
he has repeatively stepped over his heighth of power, over ruling other branches of the government.
he profits of the racist, bullsh*t war both politically and finacialy.
2006-06-30 04:09:08 · answer #1 · answered by Dahlia Jihad 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I think we've been misled on so many things. I think Bush Jr wanted to finish what his daddy started, and the whole 9-11 thing was the perfect excuse to go back to Iraq. We've made no progress finding Osama bin Laden and we've lost the goodwill of most of the world. I think in the end, we'll find that Bush lied about a lot more things than we know right now.
Oh..and speaking as an American living in Canada, Canadians don't hate Americans. That's not the Canadian way. Canadians sometimes have a hard time separating the peoples' ideals from the government's actions though.
2006-06-30 04:02:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I believed Bush committed a crime, I'd be calling for his head, even though I voted for him twice. But, he's not committed a single crime, nor has he lied. The GOP does not support officials who break the law, unlike the Dems who seem to lionize them.
It was the GOP congressional leaders who told Nixon to resign, because they would have impeached him and voted for his removal - because he committed a crime. Contrast this with the Dems who all voted against Clinton's impeachment and removal, even though his crimes were similar to Nixon's.
As for Iraq, it was the right decision and has accomplished much. It's too bad that the Dems are working hard to make sure it fails, all for the purpose of partisan political power. That is loathsome.
2006-06-30 04:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, what about the war "in" Iraq? It's more like the against Iraq. That's what some were calling a while back.
YES, Yes. He should be impeached and put in a bunker with OBL.
2006-06-30 04:02:40 · answer #4 · answered by franksway 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no longer any 'reliable motives' or 'excuses' to question an respected. Impeachment is the approach of charging an respected with against the regulation. whilst the respected commits against the regulation, they are eligible for impeachment. commencing a conflict isn't against the regulation, surprisingly whilst the legislature approved it. the warriors in Iraq volunteered, they do no longer seem to be being forcibly killed. in case you are able to impeach Bush for "commencing a conflict in Iraq", then you definitely ought to impeach all of us who voted particular to approve the conflict. This is composed of many democrats, which incorporate Hillary Clinton and John Kerry.
2016-12-14 03:10:17 · answer #5 · answered by lipskar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A free Iraq is a terrorist worst nightmare eliminating any possibility of there way of life. Muslims who have been restricted from worshiping as they believe have been oppressed for decades there. They will now have an unstifled voice. This puts pressure on other tyrannical governments in the region to lax there grip on the people of their country. The domino effect is in motion. Qaddafi got the message soon. Others will follow suit. GWB will go down in history as a liberator and the left wing is holding there stomachs ready to puke for that reason.
2006-06-30 04:10:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should definitely be impeached for committing atrocities against innocent Iraqis & also for the wastage of resources(as no WMD were found)
Do you think there is a lack of (American)bullies to threaten & cause destruction to poor countries?definitely not and so the power hugry people would still be continuing war in Iraq.I reckon so.
2006-06-30 04:09:45 · answer #7 · answered by afiasan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course he should not be impeached. What nonsense. His critics, such as soreloser Gore, should be ashamed of even suggesting such rubbish. Both parties should rally around a President in wartime, and the war on terrorism is a Real War.
2006-06-30 04:01:42 · answer #8 · answered by Mannie H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should quit with the Bush bashing. Let him finish his term, and wait for the next person to take over (which will more than likely be a Democrat).
if you aren't happy with the President, you are more than welcome to move to Canada or France. They hate us as much as they hate the President.
2006-06-30 04:02:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not impeached. I could live with a censure.
2006-06-30 04:03:46 · answer #10 · answered by theFo0t 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋