Who or What was it for? Give me your best scenario.
2006-06-30 02:45:40 · 6 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The point most people seem to be missing is that for years the ultra-conservative "El Rushbo" would go on his radio show and say things like: ""Too many whites are getting away with drug use. The answer is to ... find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them, and send them up the river.", all the while he was popping Oxycotin like it was candy. "El Drugbo" is what he should have been calling himself.
2006-06-30 04:06:11 · answer #1 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was legally perscribed under another name for privacy. He adressed it but because of his Indiscression with oxycotin and the way he handeled blaming eveyrone for invading his privacy when they did the investigation versus just being forthright sort of make this come to fuition and the press likes to kick people in the nads all the time anyway. They dont' care if it's Rush Or Brittney.
2006-06-30 09:50:57 · answer #2 · answered by xx_muggles_xx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, I believe it was legally prescribed to him. He just didn't have his name on the bottle. He has his doctor's name on the bottle for security reasons.
Why he needs it is a personal thing and is not mine or your business.
Rush is not addicted to oxycontin any more. He is clean. The liberal left wingers made sure he paid his price for his addiction.
Aren't there any serious issues that can be discussed on YA?
2006-06-30 09:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now you are being judgemental and rude.
He has admitted that his is a drug addict, and all you feel-good liberals should be feeling sorry for him and making excuses like how he had a difficult childhood and it isn't really his fault.
Isn't that what you do for the Kennedy family??
And as for the viagara, we all know what it is used for, and if he had a prescription in his doctor's name, THE DOCTOR gave it to him, so the doctor is really the one at fault anyway.
Come-on, you liberal skulls-full-of-mush... THINK!
2006-06-30 09:51:50 · answer #4 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares. However, I think if customs is going to suddenly begin searching people on one private plane, they better begin searching them all. Otherwise, you on the left better start screaming "profiling".
2006-06-30 09:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe he had ED. sounds like a logical explanation to me
2006-06-30 09:47:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋