The U.S. put him in and now wants him out.
His honesty, decency, sincerity and dignity serve to highlight the duplicity of those he has to work with, including the U.S.A.
2006-06-30 00:48:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The U.S. kicked out the previous incumbent, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, at the insistence of Israel, simply because he was Arab and they put Annan forward and got him "elected". Much of the UN is corrupt and votes can easily be bought.
But thanx for all replies - they show me the extent of American dislike for the man.
2006-06-30 15:58:29 · update #1
Ah, Kofi. Before being SG, Kofi was in charge of UN peacekeeper forces. While there he kept getting urgent messages from the UN troops in Rwanda. He promptly ignored them, and 800,000 people were brutally murdered. What a hero Kofi is.
And in reviewing the atrocities in Darfur, Kofi has seen no genocide, despite over 1,000,000 blacks being killed by the Arab Muslim government and its agents. Heck, he has no problem with Sudan being on the UN Human Rights commission. And, he seems to have no problem with the fact that over $25 billion was kicked back to Saddam in the UN Oil-for-Blood Money scandal.
So, as far as I can see, Kofi is a typical useless tea-sipping corrupt and uncaring sack of manure.
That's why Clinton loved him so much. So alike.
2006-06-30 01:18:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dag Hammarskjold
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1961/hammarskjold-bio.html
2006-06-30 07:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by nickdmd 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure there was after all Annan hasn't done anything to help in Sudan. He says what is taking place is "near genocide". He needs to step in and help the nations that have been pleading for U.N help.
2006-06-30 07:55:18 · answer #3 · answered by in vino veritas 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what are you smoking? Can you spell "Oil for food" for beginners? What do you mean the US put him in? That position is voted on. Where do you people get this stuff?
2006-06-30 07:53:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry but what makes u think he is doing a gud job he couldn't stop America from attacking Iraq and has not been able extend security council seats.
2006-06-30 07:54:45 · answer #5 · answered by knu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Waht are you talking about? leo was right, oil for food scam, enough said. When need to get our own Bolton in there.
2006-06-30 08:20:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All cut from the same cloth... woven by superpowers. Puppets.
2006-06-30 08:08:02 · answer #7 · answered by erlish 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perez de Cuillar was the best
2006-06-30 07:51:47 · answer #8 · answered by Roland 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the us's policy is quite un understable because when you do right and they are offende then they fall out with you.
2006-06-30 07:54:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have all been about the same. Do nothings.
2006-06-30 07:57:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋