English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-29 23:55:57 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Other - Social Science

34 answers

we would hvae no depth perception.. we wouldnt be able to tell how close and far things are away from us..

2006-06-29 23:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 7 2

No. Then we would have no depth perception.

Personally, I think it would be better if we had 3 eyes. Then you could talk to somebody, look them dead in the eye and look around the room at the same time. And, to show that you are really serious, you could look at them with all 3 eyes at once.

2006-06-29 23:57:44 · answer #2 · answered by I Know Nuttin 5 · 0 0

No, having two eyes is better than one.

2006-06-30 00:04:32 · answer #3 · answered by Alina R 1 · 0 0

i dont think so bc what if u were driving and u got an eyelash in your 1 eye. at least w/2 eyes u can still see, somewhat. LOL -a-

2006-06-29 23:58:45 · answer #4 · answered by [Isaiah born 12/31/09!] 5 · 0 0

I can see no advantage in having one eye unless it had many lenses. Still, didn't the Cyclops in Greek mythology get his eye put out?

2006-06-30 01:07:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends on where the eye would be. Would it be right in the middle of your forehead? Or would it just be the same just missing your right or left eye? Which would you keep left or right?

2006-06-30 00:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by micron816 4 · 0 0

To see less of what's going on around us? No, I'd like to keep both eyes opened with one on each kid... This is the reason children think their mom's have special powers ... They see all =)

2006-06-30 00:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by sakura4eternity 5 · 0 0

Totally, as a matter of fact I stuck my di ck in my right eye so I can't see out of it any more. It's the coolest. You've got to try it.

2006-06-29 23:59:12 · answer #8 · answered by jimmyrm_25 3 · 0 0

What a wonderful idea. We would save on glasses, contact lenses and girls would not need to use as much eye makeup as they do now!

2006-06-30 00:03:25 · answer #9 · answered by clarence 3 · 0 0

With no depth perception? And where do you suggest we put the nose, in place of the other eye?

2006-06-29 23:59:06 · answer #10 · answered by Dan S 7 · 0 0

1

2016-06-20 01:17:57 · answer #11 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers