2006-06-29 23:53:17 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
There are probably about a dozen people who think he's innocent - they were called the jury. He's famous and rich, therefore the laws that apply to other Americans do not apply to him. On a personal note I just hope I never have to hear or see him again.
2006-06-30 00:02:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is all very difficult to say. the fact that he has a campl playland for children at his house is a very strange and scary concept which would usually prove thta hes nuts. on the other hand though he feels as though he had a bad childhood and is trying to give back to the children. what makes the actualy desion on this argument very difficult is his fame. from one side he could be getting away with the trials is because he has so much much and fame but on the other hand he might be getting accused of doing what he does for the same reason. i think hes a very strange person but i dont think he commited the crime. and if he did the parents who let there children go over there are just morons. youd think that if he had already been accused of mulestation once you wouldnt let your kids go over there to begin with. in general when your that famous people are always out to get a free peace of the money. same thing happened with mike tyson and the kobe bryant insident. i would still say hes innocent and the parents were out for money simply on the fact that they let their child go over there after the first trial on the same matter.
2006-06-30 07:04:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is innocent, but weird, and its not his fault. He never got a chance to enjoy his childhood b/c he was beaten for messing up on a note. He never wanted any child to go through this, therefore he built the amusement park. He is actually enjoying his childhood that he never had. that's why he thinks its ok to sleep with a child. anytime he was guilty, parents wouldn't continue to send their kids over there. The lady who accused him of molesting her child was also busted for foodstamp fraud. She was money hungry.
2006-06-30 10:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Very Unique 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do definitely!! They never had any evidence against him! All they had was a couple of gold digging moms who had done shady stuff for money in the past!!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2006-06-30 09:44:42 · answer #4 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Money and fame have influence.....obviously........how many times has he gone through this and got off ???
So many think he is innocent.
Do I ? NO
Too many accounts and too many turning a blind eye. They say justice is blind??? Only if you have enough money and you can when you pay it off to be.
2006-06-30 14:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by Wish you knew 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt MJ and his innocence.
2006-06-30 07:02:49 · answer #6 · answered by Nish 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dunno exactly if he's innocent or not...bt all i cn say is there is no smoke if there aint a fire burnin...every rumour's basic is truth...!! and he's bin accused soo many times...in diff places and years...so i cnt surely say he's innocent...sumthin must b fishy .......bt the ans to dat is hidden..which only he knws or probably da victims...
2006-06-30 06:57:22 · answer #7 · answered by mysterious 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that so called man is so not innocent
he should be locked up balls cut off he is disgusting in my eyes respect
shaz
2006-06-30 07:05:03 · answer #8 · answered by sharon B 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not me he is a perve of the worst kind, the one everyone knows about but gets away with it because of his fame.........I hope his Di*k falls off just like his nose.....ha ha
2006-06-30 06:56:29 · answer #9 · answered by debra_har 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think he's innocent but he is a bit weird but thats not a crime hey!!!
2006-06-30 07:00:00 · answer #10 · answered by springo88 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋