English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

NO - he's not a Hollywood star. He made is mark through New York radio

2006-06-29 19:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by Signilda 7 · 0 0

the band kiss got a star in the seventies before they had a single gold record so its not all about movies/hollywood. besides he's responsible for more innovations all over the spectrum that people have stolen and made their own, the list is immense. what's hilarious is the people that hate stern are the one's laughing at leno's jaywalking,the punk'd interviewer kid, game shows etc..............
sure he deserves one.
thing is some fan would chip it out of the sidewalk

2006-06-29 21:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by shaney 3 · 0 0

Yes, because he showed US how the First Amendment was very biased and that the government and other officials have such a hold on the freedom of speech that he had to move to satellite radio.

2006-06-29 19:16:27 · answer #3 · answered by monavyas15 4 · 0 0

Are you serious? Yes. Do you know how many naked women he has had on his show? More than youll ever get. Therefore he is a star in my eyes.

2006-06-29 19:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by flyinonice 2 · 0 0

no. hes just a shock jock... hes far from deserving a star

2006-06-29 20:34:41 · answer #5 · answered by matt s 1 · 0 0

Hell no! He's talentless and wears a mop on his head :S

2006-06-29 19:31:11 · answer #6 · answered by c@ramel_m@mi 3 · 0 0

For one movie? no.

2006-06-29 19:21:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hell no he is a bum

2006-06-29 19:17:21 · answer #8 · answered by milesigo 2 · 0 0

No.

2006-06-29 19:12:00 · answer #9 · answered by John 6 · 0 0

in my opinion ,,,, no !!!!

2006-06-29 19:12:12 · answer #10 · answered by buckbuchanan99 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers