The libtards like to complain about President Bush but he has commited no crime, nor will he ever.
2006-06-29 16:22:06 · 9 answers · asked by NONAME 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah go toot that horn somewhere else. Do you not know all the lies that Bush told to send our young men to war? What I say is why don't they stay out of peoples bedrooms and take care of the boardroom. Who gives a **** if Clinton got a little on the side and lied. do you know a man who has cheated who admitted it from the start? Not! Maybe if Bush would get a little on the side his mind wouldn't be so full of **** he might be able to speak in complete intelligible sentences. I would much rather have a lie about sex than a lie about lives.
2006-06-29 16:31:27 · answer #1 · answered by plushy1 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They did not get enough votes in the Senate to convict. Probably because they felt lying about sex was not enough to remove a president elected by the majority of the people, who was doing an excellent job otherwise.
A case could be made that Bush has committed several crimes. Since he has never been put under oath, he has never been put it the position that Clinton was. If the democrats gain control of Congress, Bush could be put under oath and these crimes exposed. Whether or not he should be impeached should that happen I am not sure right now.
Get your facts straight. Nixon was never impeached, he resigned before he could be brought to trial.
2006-06-29 23:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to look up what the consequences are for being impeached but presidents do have a choice on whether to step down or not. Clinton never thought he did anything wrong. He thought he was a victim like most liberals do. When Nixon was impeached he did the right thing and stepped down because he had the strength and character to admit that he made a mistake like all people do at times.
2006-06-29 23:32:16 · answer #3 · answered by Scott R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because in the big scheme of things, all he did was lie about getting a ********. That is not enough to remove a man elected by the US. To remove a president is to go against the electoral process, and the reason better be pretty good to do that.
By the way, I have asked my wife and for some reason she thinks that me receiving one does constitute cheating. Unfortunately the Clinton defense won't fly in my house.
2006-06-29 23:38:03 · answer #4 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill had charm. He was a charming rascal. Could lie himself out of any trouble and the people would still love him. He was Slick Willy but ever so popular. Bush has no charm and is ever so unpopular. I always feared that Bill the megalomaniac would use any excuse to declare martial law, but Bush would do it "for our own good". Bill was a charming conman. Bush is a deceptive devil.
2006-06-29 23:37:55 · answer #5 · answered by pshdsa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The House voted to IMPEACH, The senate lacked only a few votes
but only out of kindness, to put the mess behind us and move on, and not to have to deal with a Owl Gore as prez.
2006-06-29 23:31:14 · answer #6 · answered by Renegade 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah They Say He overstepped his bounds set by the Law of the Land but, well you know what Everyone thinks Clinton is the Sexiest man on Earth so... you know what I'm not too sure... politics is the only thing I can think of.
2006-06-29 23:25:54 · answer #7 · answered by Andrew L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Congress, cut him a deal.
2006-06-29 23:25:08 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WOW...your more of an idiot than you know....
2006-06-30 01:25:51 · answer #9 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋