many think that america went too far acting as world police and dominating all.
some say they through wheat in ocean while africa is starving and they kill and torture for oiwhat u think?pls be swubjective
2006-06-29
14:47:13
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
for that girl how are u helping in iraq?
more than 100,000 killed is it what help meansand about throwing wheat in ocean ?all it will not kill u farmers for sure but will decrease u control on world? u dont care actually let them die we can sell them weapons only
2006-06-29
15:21:15 ·
update #1
The beginning of the end for the whole world passed milleniums ago. The very end of existence for this planet will probably end in the next 100 years when a giant meteor smashes into the ground, but at least that will be out of our lifetimes!
Bush is not smart enough to be a new Hitler but maybe his puppetmaster behind the curtain, Dick Cheney will become one.
2006-06-29 14:51:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Err, I don't think Bush is a new Hitler cause he's not trying to conquer the world or get rid of people to make the perfect Aryan race or whatever. Maybe Bush is going too far acting as the world police, but even though I think America peaked, I really don't think it's close to the end yet. And it's not his fault that Africa is starving and the getting rid of wheat and stuff, it's for our own economy's benefit cause, otherwise, farmers and those would be bankrupt and then they wouldn't produce food, anymore, and it'd be a long cycle that would ruin us. I really don't see the "torture" part, except for isolated incidences. And killing just happens in war
2006-06-29 21:53:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ashley 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, there are differences between Bush and Hitler. In Hitler's time, Germany was in great poverty. With his ability to speak convincingly, he rose to power and fooled the whole country into joining him on his quest for world domination. On the other hand, America isn't in extreme poverty, Bush can't convince people, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have no parallel to world domination. So to answer your question: No, this isn't the end of America (remember, Bush only has 2 years left in office and the Congressional elections are coming up) and Bush isn't the new Hitler.
I'm going to add something else. There's always going to be negative perceptions of America. However, if you take a look at it, America does a lot to help other nations.
2006-06-29 21:54:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by 2-3,2-4,4-3,4-4,3-4,4-2,5-4 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok... It's understandable how some people feel this way. American's in general have ALWAYS been wasteful. Bush is not a new hitler, and even if it were that bad, he was reeclected by the people. And the people who don't like him, at least know that his presidency does have a limit and will not be in office for ever. We help liberate countries in distress. And in some peoples eyes, we may go too far. But to people in those foreign lands who are too weak to fight, we are rambo, superman, GI Joe, we are there hero's. So there's two sides to it. P.S. ~ We are one of the few and the biggest distributer to Africa
2006-06-29 21:54:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Josh T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the begining of the end started in the 60's and bush is no more hitler than slick willie
2006-06-29 21:53:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joseph P 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you think we should go to africa and help the people there?
If you do, why aren't you happy we are helping the Iraqi people?
Are you a hypocrite?
2006-06-29 22:05:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler had brains ....
2006-06-29 21:52:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sashie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
AMEN
2006-06-29 23:19:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Plus-Sized &Proud 4
·
0⤊
0⤋