You sound angry. Poor thing. All hot and bothered......Ann Coulter's hot!
Ann Coulter says. "I put a book out -- and liberals were hysterical. "Actually," she explained "they can't help themselves. They're like my pets!"
In a lengthy interview with the New York Observer's George Gurley, Coulter had verbal darts to hurl at a number of the liberal icons.
Asked "What do liberals want?" she said it's "Apparently the total destruction of the United States. But they get to keep their houses in Amagansett."
Cindy Sheehan. Asked what she thought Sheehan's son, Casey, might wish his mother to do, Coulter said he'd "Wish that she'd shut up? Pipe down?" Casey, she added, "is an amazing American hero -- that was the story that was being lost in all of this. As she [Cindy] becomes Dennis Rodman and just makes a spectacle of herself, he was a great American patriot. For one thing, he had already re-enlisted. He didn't have to go; he died on amission he was volunteering for to help save his buddies -- he was incredibly heroic. And I think it's too bad that most people don't know that."
Bill Clinton's legacy: "That he never denied raping Juanita Broaddrick. And Hillary Clinton has the audacity to accuse me of being mean to women."
Were liberals upset about Al-Zarqawi getting blown up? "Yes, well, naturally they were bummed out, because that got al-Qaida mad at us, and we have been getting along so beautifully until then."
2006-06-29 14:48:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by thealligator414 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
I knew the inequities were severe yet those are some recommendations blowing numbers. a great deal of the money for the 9/11 households of victims became from inner most and public donation, it really is the reason the numbers are so great. It had little to do with federal funding, so the Oklahoma city bombing victims would favor to defer to this reality. Rush does a good interest of bringing information to the table, this is too undesirable that liberals won't be able to comprehend his fee and recognize what he does for the real reality seekers. this is one aspect for liberals to disclaim the reality, this is extremely yet another to demonize the messinger.
2016-11-30 00:39:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me tell you this, yes, the wives and children and family members of people who died on 9/11/01 are victims.
However you didn't read Ann Coulter's book, you make statements with out actually reading what she is saying, but I don't blame you for that, that is the left wing medias fault.
Anyway, what Ann Coulter is saying is that some of the victims aren't acting like victims, they will parade around with on the Presidental election with John Kerry and promote their own or someone else's political agenda.
So please will you stop getting all hot and bothered over something you heard on NBC or ABC and actually take time to read the book and make your own decision about the book.
P.S. On the part of the victims who are real victims, she is wrong about them, the victims I described to you about, those people she is correct about.
2006-06-29 14:53:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't just take one sentance out of her book, and let it characterize how conservatives think...
First, Coulter is out to sell books, and controversy usually does the trick nicely. Don't forget that most people have an agenda.
Second..there are some things with 9/11 funds that happened that are not fair..and never will be so. This is not to say that noone feels sorry for the widows/widowers...but there is a point where people need to begin being realistic.
2006-06-29 14:49:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by loubean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, it's great to see you're still ranting...really. I missed it.
Yes, the people who lost loved ones on 9/11 are victims...but considering the fact that they get more compensation than a wife who loses her husband to the war in Iraq is just ridiculous. What about all the people who have lost loved ones through other tragedies? And why should we have to pay for it?
It was a tragedy, and I ache for them. But my father died as a direct result from his stint in Viet Nam, and yet my mom didn't get jack **** from the government for it. We had to WORK for everything we've got.
So should those who lost loved ones on 9/11.
That's my opinion, anyway, though I don't know exactly which remarks she made that you're referring to. She's just not someone I'm interested in. I don't need someone to preach anything I believe.
2006-07-06 13:23:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't get it. Simple they the wives entered the political arena. Now you say they can not be challenged that's a bunch of bull. They can not hide behind the shield of 9/11. Its like whats his name the person starts with M always beating his gums who was a marine and now in congress wants to cut and run. He can't be challenged Bull (heard some doubt on his war record, also involved in a payment scam by FBI) Oh well its OK they are Dem's
2006-06-29 15:06:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by retired_afmil 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She was right.
November of this year? She is an author not a politician, so she won't be running. Are you to say that just because someone has a loved one die in a tragedy, that person should be able to speak their mind without being criticized?
2006-06-29 14:50:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Boob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are victims, yes. And they have, indeed, used their "victimhood," after they were extremely well compensated, for furthering their own political agendas. They weren't the first. They won't be the last. Nothing in the whole situation should surprise anyone, and they shouldn't be surprised for being criticized for it.
2006-06-29 14:50:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tub T (Mike Blanche) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think since (M)ann Coulter isn't a victim of a government attack on American civilians, she should mind her own business about how other people who are victims grieve their dead.
2006-07-06 12:25:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She did not attack all Widows she attacked only thr 4 Widows who decided to support Liberal causes and acted as if the fact they were Widows gave them an excuse to do whatever they darn well please without consequence.
Im sorry these Ladies lost their Husband but that does not excuse them from unacceptable behavior.
2006-06-29 14:51:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not all the wife's of victims just those 4 morons from NJ.
2006-06-29 14:48:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Zen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋