The Superman Returns Movie...Yay or NAY?

Question

Did anybody like the new "Superman Returns" Movie?
Was it worth the money? or Was it a rip-off?
Was the storyline good? or Was it aweful?
Did it beat the originals? or Was it a flop?

Let me know what you TRULY think?
Thanks!

Answer 1

Brandon Routh played a great Superman and reminded me a lot of Christopher Reeves

Kevin Spacey played a better Lex Luthor than Gene Hackman.

Kate Bosworth was not a very good Lois Lane I thought Margot Kidder played her better.

all in all I thought the movie was very good. I thought Kevin played Lex much more ruthless like he is in the comic books.

Answer 2

how about a hey!

I saw the flick on preshow and have been trying my best not to ruin the movie for others who haven't gotten to see it yet.

I liked it. The actor, Routh?, who played Kent/Supe did a great job stepping in on that part. Although he looked a little too GQ for me, he still had the Superman look. I just had a real hard time seeing the actress cast as Lois Lane. She didn't pull it off enough for me.

I think it was indeed worth the money and not a rip off. It was the modernday story of a tale versed in the 50's. It did not place superman in the Smallville agenda (thank the gods).

The storyline, I thought, was different. I mean yeah, Lex luthor was still trying to take over the world by power. Lex still had the lady unluck aspect (think he'd learn by now). But the storyline wasn't about the "marvelous" deeds the DC hero could do...it was a human tragedy and inspirational piece. If you can dig it, then buy it.

There is no way this one single fiolm could beat the original films. Mr. Reeves bore a legend in the b&w serials and Mr. Reeve made a legend happen. Mr. Routh successed in extending that legend. I think possibly, Mr. Routh could have been Mr. Reeve's son...or at least a close cousin. He was a great visual choice for the part aswell as a great substitute, if you can pardon that vulgar term. In no way am I stating he was a second choice, merely that since Mr. Reeve was not available, Mr. Routh preformed admirably.

Answer 3

It's was very good with a lot of throw backs to the classics.

The only part I didn't like was that Superman drank. These disturbed me because Superman is the ideal person and every way, the ultimate role model for kids. In the last Superman movie after Superman drinks he goes completely bad.

I guess Budweiser has enough money to buy even Superman's morals.

As for the comments that it is a rip off of Spiderman, that is false.

***Some what of a Spoiler****

The story actually takes the opposite approach, and shows want happens when the hero choices the saving the world over the woman.

Answer 4

the movie has a secret you find out near the end. it's pretty surprising, but done well. It's 2 1/2 hours long though. The actors who play superman & lois are so good looking, it's almost unbelievable. There's a cool effect of superman being shot in the eyeball and the bullet bounces off his eye...awesome. Many other realistic special effects.

Answer 5

I thought the movie was the greatest movie ever, and yes i did like the movie. i think it was worth the money, i would see the movie over and over again. The storyline was good, i really understood the movie can wait to the second movie to come out. i think is better than the originals because it got more technology. superman is the best superhero ever!!!

Answer 6

I've seen the original Superman TV series, Superman I, II and III. To be totally honest, the Superman genre or "ism" is for those who still believe in idealism or in something greater in themselves. Children still believe, some of the older generation still believe, but for those of us who have seen a lot of terrible things happen for more than 30 years...Superman is nothing but an illusion. The true superheroes are those who work to feed their families, care for the sick, defend our country, stay committed to their loved ones, deal honestly with others...those are real heroes and heroines. They don't need a red cape and wear underwear outside their tights. Yeah, Superman may be a commercial success...but it can't compare to the real heroes.

Answer 7

It was not as good as Superman 2. Not as good as the recent Spiderman or the first 2 X-men movies, but way better than the Hulk movie. High quality in every respect, but too long and slow.

Answer 8

this is the baby. Superman has intercourse with Lois in 2. you need to drop the different action pictures for Superman Returns to make experience. She has to have been pregnant whilst Superman is going to Krypton for the schedule interior the hot action picture to artwork. of direction the relationship is week. Luther is going to detention center in one. the final is going to area detention center in 2. And in a Superman tries to end nuclear proliferation and lands up diserting the international and having to exhibit regret for his absence, If he did circulate off to Krypton there must be a narrative there. the subject is on the top of two, clark kisses Lois and wipes her memory of te intercourse, so; how could she react whilst she is without warning pregnant and can't remember who the father is? enter her article in this action picture and you will possibly think of she figured a number of it out for herself.

Answer 9

I'm not gonna waste my money. That sh*t is outdated. Maybe back in the day before terrorism, biological warfare, and 9/11. The story is so antiquated and would probably only capture the interest of young children or old farts that lived back when it was popular.

Answer 10

In my opinion the movie is a fake-ripoff because in the trailer it looks like a copy cat of Spider-Man & you know know super-hero movies will never be as good as "Spider-Man" because Spider-Man is the BEST superhero i've ever heard off!

I Say A NAY!