What do you think about reports telling you if past convicted "Meth" user move in next door?

Question

Do you think the insurance companies would raise the cost of "Fire" protection if this information became public???

Answer 1

I'm agianst telling about users! MOSTLY they are only harming themselves, and if they are overcoming their addiction the stigma is only harmful.

Dealers and manufacturers, on the other hand are scum! The chemicals emitted in the production of Meth are not only explosive, they are also extreemly hazardus to human health. And by producing or pushing this poison in neighborhoods, they are destroying families!!

Answer 2

Seems reasonable to inform the neighbors from the neighbor's perspective, but it's definitely a violation of the previous meth user's rights. People have a right to start over without have their reputation ruined.

Daniel
iPowerGRFX Web Designers
http://www.ipowergrfx.com
http://www.publicadjuster.com

Answer 3

I think it would be subject to abuse as is the sexual offender requirement, anyone can enter a neighborhood and start a rumor and destroy a persons life. If it is only done through law enforcement and anyone else is prosecuted for providing false information it could be an effective deterrent for people who care about their reputation, however most people who are addicted to drugs of any type do not care about anything including reputation.

Answer 4

Yes. Everyone is always trying to get more money.

Answer 5

YES INSURANCE COMPANIES WILL USE ANYTHING THEY CAN GET TO RAISE HOMEOWNERS RATES

Answer 6

I say ask them to share.

Answer 7

probably