English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should we end DADT or should we keep it going

2006-06-29 11:55:02 · 12 answers · asked by Mj 1 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

Bush prefers other issues to telling the truth about anything.

2006-06-29 11:58:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Gays in the military is more important than the daily conflict and death that goes on in Iraq? Wow, for someone criticizing someone else's priorities, you sure have some screwy ones yourself, lol. Down with the gays first, and worry about people dying later. Hmmm.
In answer to your question, there are selected issues on the presidential agenda that are predetermined and intended to distract you from what is not reported by the media, because most of them aren't even aware it's going on. DADT probably won't be slated on the agenda at all, considering that his big homophobic issue was gay marriage. It might resurface towards national election time, but it will be other DC fat cats pushing the issue, not the President. What does he care? He'll be out in 2 years anyways. I'd be surprised if he doesn't skip out early, considering he's done that with every other career he's had.

2006-06-29 12:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by mia_violenza 3 · 0 0

because this is where his focus is ,and his allience

quote.


If I'm critical of my country's leaders, I'm a traitor. "
The horrible tyranny that is being created by the Bush junta is a threat to the entire world. For the first time in its history, Western Civilization as a whole is in danger of being destroyed by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown,
Rothschild, DuPont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well.
This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.

The Bush family, beginning with Prescott Bush, have served as satraps of the Rockefeller, Brown, and Harriman interests. President Bush is simply a puppet of this powerful cabal, and their schemes will be
carried out by whatever next president comes to power unless We the People deflect them from this insane, murderous plot for global dom- inance

Millions of people's lives have been destroyed by lack of knowledge in the past. Today, Billions more may succumb to the lies and hatred of those who strive with all their might to mold our perceptions and
minds. There exists a small group of powerful people, David Rockefeller is one of them, who today command vast fortunes and they wish to own and control the entire world for themselves. A small number of the
rich and powerful have learned how to incrementally control the vast majority of us through our own individual prejudices, desires, and greed. When stacked up, that represents almost a total power monopoly
over humanity into a few hands. Source(s) http://houston.indymedia.org/

2006-06-29 12:00:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What made her reaction much greater embarrassing is Gibson gently attempted to get her on course by way of giving her some counsel approximately it yet she refused to pay attention and think of because of the fact it wasn't in her record of programmed responses. Charles Gibson is hardly ever a tough journalist and making excuses for her saying he grow to be basically attempting to trip her up would not say plenty for the thought you all have been touting that she is clever and speedy. i think of the reason she "did no longer blink" is by technique of the fact somebody forgot to alter her battery.

2016-12-14 03:00:19 · answer #4 · answered by shaughnessy 4 · 0 0

Is that what he told you, that he was focusing on other issues instead of the incredibly crucial issue of DADT? Oh, my gawd!

2006-06-29 11:59:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is the silliest question I've seen in awhile. This is more important than.........?????? I don't like him even a little bit but if he's not addressing this issue he gets a teeny tiny pat on the back from me.

2006-06-29 12:02:05 · answer #6 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0 0

Why is it important to you?? Why should any American have to state their sexual preference? Last time I looked it wasn't a line on the employment application.

Sexual orientation like religion should be kept to yourself.

2006-06-29 13:14:04 · answer #7 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0 0

Yeah, THAT'S the most important issue going....

2006-06-29 11:59:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nothing's wrong with gay people being in the military - IT IS LOADED WITH GAY PEOPLE AND IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN!! If anyone has a problem with it, they should just deal with it because gay people are everywhere.

2006-06-29 11:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

make it do ask and do tell

2006-06-29 11:58:19 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers