why doesnt sven play walcott?

Question

hes clearly a good striker, he seems to play with more tranquility than all the wingers except J.Cole

Answer 1

Because Sven's got no balls. Why take the boy if he's not intending to play him.

Answer 2

it kind of feels a waste of a squad area if he does not, we went into this adventure with Owen having in user-friendly terms performed a handful of minutes considering New 12 months anddoubts over Rooney's wellbeing, there's a asserting while you're good adequate you are the right age yet you ought to think of how gamers like Bent and Defoe ought to experience after Owen's harm and us all the way down to 3 strikers, i don't understand the hype over Crouch as we had him on the Villa and he could not hit a cow's backside with a banjo. If i became Sven i might have had the two of the two gamers above for the sake of a defender or perhaps Walcott exceptionally as Sven's by no ability seen him play and his loss of high quality flight journey. i'm not confident by ability of any of the squad on the 2d aside from Stevie G, the clicking have over hyped England as quickly as back.

Answer 3

Because it's the knock out stages of the world cup and Walcott hasn't even played a premiership game yet. The question should be 'why did Sven take Walcott'?

Answer 4

Sven's girlfriend thinks he's cute so he was brought along to be "boytoy" which also explains why he isn't playing - she wears him out! lol!

Answer 5

how can you say he's a good striker, nobody has seen him play, not even sven. are you his agent?

Answer 6

Because he's not ready.It was a brave shout at the time.I reall y hope it doesn't affect our chances in the semi's.

Answer 7

Agree with Ahwell...

Walcot just got a free ride....

Answer 8

u know what harry redknapp say that theo is not good especially when he try to attack by himself .He often lose the ball to opposition.