Because Bin-Laden was too easy to catch.. LOL
2006-07-01 19:17:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by dan m 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Speaking as a veteran who served over in Iraq during the beginning and was in the brigade that caught Saddam I say this. Saddam is a horrible man, the stories I heard would make you cringe. He needed to be removed from power, if we had our way he wouldn't have come out that hole alive.
2006-06-29 16:45:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by obxsoldier 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is more important to go after Bin laden.It is the wrong war at the wrong time.
2006-06-29 17:03:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
...and more oil, not to mention that little thing about dad not 'getting him' the first time. yeah, things are much better now. MIssion accomplished
2006-06-29 16:33:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by otto 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why Hitler?
2006-06-29 17:37:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by L3 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
oil, oil, oil, and oil.
2006-06-29 16:32:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by david c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOT,NOT,NOT,NOT,NOT...OIL....AND WHY HITLER?
2006-07-05 21:55:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
0⤋