they suck
2006-06-29 09:04:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by jmharley79 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Okay Paris Hilton is not only untalented she is ugly frankly I would rather kiss her dogs butt then look at her plastic fake blonde face again she looks stoned all the time and shes not attractive
Brandy has some talent as much as i don't like to admit it.. and at least she looks to be alot warmer then alot of the hacks on this list that slept their way to where they are
Camron Deiz isn't Oscar worthy but she has a lot more talent then a vast majority of this list
Britney Spears and Pamala Anderson used the same plastic surgery kick to get them where they are like Anna Nickole and so many others
I personally would like to put all the non talent hacks in a pit the one to come out alive at the end of three days can get any contract they want... so its only one and not 20
2006-06-29 16:22:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gwen Kerr-Healy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some of the people on your list are talented. The other people...I am wondering why they are still famous, for example, Ashlee Simpson. She can't sing, act or dance. It is interesting to find out that she was with the American ballet company and on SNL and in all of her videos it seemed that she lost all ability to dance.
Paris Hilton is only in the spotlight because her grandfather has a chain of successful hotels but, she has done nothing that has contributed to that.
Hilary Duff does want to be everything...its just too bad that she isn't successful at anything that she does.
2006-06-29 16:31:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Smartie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, spelling is off-point but hey... whatever. To answer your question though talent contains a wide spectrum so although I respect your opinion of the so-called "untalented", I disagree with a couple of people that you named. J-Lo is a triple threat (i.e., singing,acting,dancing) and she has a cool clothing line which definitely shows her talent. Jamie Foxx acts,sings,and is funny as heck if I might say so myself. The others... well some people actually like them so I have no opinion on them.
2006-06-29 16:16:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by ~The baby's finally here~ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some have bought their fame,some have slept their way up to the top,some are a matter of your own opinion and some may not have a good voice or act very good but they have invested wisely in side lines with the money they have earned so that makes them a business talent..There will always be underdogs in the industry..
2006-06-29 16:08:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by *toona* 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was just going to say that Paris Hilton just pisses me off. Sheryl Crow? Have you even heard her music? She is good and she actually has a trade and worked to get her fame unlike others in this category.
2006-06-29 16:04:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tact is highly overrated 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jamie Foxx does not belong on your list (anyone who saw "Ray" would agree). And Sheryl Crow? C'mon. Jack Black has potential, so I can't include him either. All the rest, not much.
2006-06-29 16:09:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Finnegan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off it's an opinion if the people listed have talent.
Second. the people I think have no talent seem to have a rich daddy!!
2006-06-29 16:06:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maimee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.paris hilton
2.brittany murphy< she laughs like a cow>
3.jessica alba < her acting sucks >
2006-06-29 16:08:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by kaa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
makes you wonder how they got where they are
but Sheryl Crow does not belong on the list and J Lo its all about Butt
2006-06-29 16:06:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr nice guy 2U 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree with most of your list, its all about $$$$, the more figures in your income, the more careers you are allowed to have, singing, acting, modeling, all that crap! doesnt matter if u have any talent what so ever!
2006-06-29 16:10:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋