2006-06-29 07:43:11 · 19 answers · asked by JS 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Everybody and everything IS. The question is not that. The question is: "What to be?"
2006-06-29 07:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's proof that even when Shakespeare was around, teenagers were considering suicide.
To be = to live
Not to be = to commit suicide
He was trying to convince himself that suicide was the brave course of action, and that if you didn't commit suicide because you were afraid of death was cowardice.
2006-06-29 14:49:01 · answer #2 · answered by Rambo Smurf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether 'tis nobler in the minds's eye to suffer the slings and arrow of outrageous fortune.....
Since Hamlet's contemplating suicide, I'd say to be.
2006-06-29 14:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by byhisgrace70295 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be-definitely
2006-06-29 14:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by Drew 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
heck ya, TO BE. What's the point of not being? Isn't that death? I don't wanna be dead, that's for sure.
2006-06-29 15:00:09 · answer #5 · answered by kid_rock 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God has a plan for me... so I will be until he takes me home to eat with him.
2006-06-29 14:49:39 · answer #6 · answered by chemical_kenny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want TO BE back home in bed.
2006-06-29 14:46:35 · answer #7 · answered by happy_fairy_gurl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be of course
2006-06-29 19:09:05 · answer #8 · answered by tensnut90_99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't kill yourself, let an opponent poison you in a fight.
2006-06-29 15:43:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That IS the question
The answer: BE
2006-06-29 14:46:05 · answer #10 · answered by johnslat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋