English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Even after everything that has happened.
I have a borther accross seas and I had damage during Katrina, I would still vote for him, You??

2006-06-29 06:51:34 · 45 answers · asked by MAS 2 in Politics & Government Politics

45 answers

Yes I would. I honestly believe that he is one of the few who actually do care about our country. He had the unfortunate opportunity to be the president who had to deal with 9/11. We should have just bombed them like we did the Japanese after Pearl Harbor and get it over with. Don't criticize him for following his heart in what he thought was the right thing to do. If you don't want to fight in a war, don't sign up in the military. It kills me how many complain, but they signed up. Do they expect to be in the military for an education? If so, go to college, not the military. These people have dedicated their lives to protecting the rights and freedoms of the citizens of this country and if that is not why they signed up, then they made a huge error in judgment in what they thought the military stands for.

2006-06-29 07:01:48 · answer #1 · answered by Andi 2 · 0 2

Yes, I would vote for him. I live in West Virginia, and there are parts of the state that have horrible flood damage just about every year. The same amount of damage caused by Katrina. But you never see those people being put in home by the government or given money to start again. I think the problem with Katrina was poor judgement on the part of the Governor, because the residence of that area were not evacuated until it was too late for the amount of people. Look at the state of Florida, they get hit very hard and because so they have a plan that works to get people informed and out of danger. As far as the war, I think it would still have happened whether or not Bush was re-elected last election. Remember a little thing called WWII??? America did not want to get involved, but then Pearl Harbor happened. Many Americans were killed on our own soil. Just like those poor people in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. No matter who was president, we would have been brought into this conflict. Bush may not be a great speaker, but he would still have my vote.

2006-06-29 07:02:38 · answer #2 · answered by RikChick 3 · 0 0

component to that 50 one%, which incorporates me, found out that Pres Bush replaced into greater beneficial acceptable than Sen Kerry. In all honesty, he has made some important blunders, yet I even though say Sen Kerry could have been a poor mistake. If the Dems had the logic to nominate Sen Lieberman, then i could have voted for a Dem. extremely, for quite some us, the vote replaced into against Sen Kerry, no longer for Pres Bush.

2016-10-31 22:29:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

NO I WOULD NOT! Anyone who would vote for Bush does NOT know the DAMAGE he is doing to us!! America doesn't need revenge - it needs a useful plan that will give American citizens JOBS that will pay their bills and health coverage we need. America needs to see our own people get help out of poverty and illness, and more aid for education. We need love and equality taught in America to people of all ages. A republican like Bush cannot and will not do these things for us. Bush is about greed, fear, hatred and bigotry. He is against the rights of women, gays and lots of others, too. He helps the rich get richer and the poor to get poorer. UNLESS YOU EARN $100,000 a year, his "tax breaks" DO NOT BENEFIT THOSE OF YOU WHO EARN $8.00 AN HOUR!!! It's time to see the working class get a fair deal and for our country to be raised on fairness and open-mindedness. NO, I WILL NOT VOTE FOR BUSH AS PRESIDENT, AND I DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM THE FIRST TIME (WHEN HE ACTUALLY LOST).

2006-06-29 07:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes I would, it takes a strong man to run a country like ours .. this President has those quality's where you like him or not.. Hes why we have not been attacked again .. People really enjoy running interference on the sitting president to try and make him look bad.. It happens to every President .. look at Clinton what a mess he was or Al Gore , you knew he invented the Internet .. the real question who will run the country next there are no good Democrats what are we to do

2006-06-29 07:12:50 · answer #5 · answered by ralphtheartist 3 · 0 0

I didn't vote for him the first two times....so obviously I wouldn't for a third.

Here's a scary thought:
He can run for presidency again after this next election.

2006-06-29 06:55:35 · answer #6 · answered by The 3rd Nipple 6 · 0 0

God no. FEMA failed during Katrina, Iraq won't become stable, Afghanistan is still bad, job rate is lower , and he keeps offering tax breaks for companies that outsource! He's costing Americans their jobs and their lives.

2006-06-29 06:56:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No way! I didn't vote for him either of the last two time, and I'm not going to start now! Actually, The first time, he lost!

2006-06-29 06:54:54 · answer #8 · answered by moviegirl 6 · 0 0

In a heart beat. I voted for him during my first Presidential election and my second.

I have lots of friends overseas and I know they would vote for him again too.

2006-06-29 06:56:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

TEXAS BORN & RAISED... SO YES!
Everybody talks about what a bad job he's done running this country, but I just don't feel the same way. He has not demonstrated anything negative or erroneous in my eyes.

2006-06-29 06:56:00 · answer #10 · answered by Rosario 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers