English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Most of us believe that Bush wasnt elected President in 2000, but appointed by the supreme court. So technically, he has only been elected once, in 2004. Which means he is legally allowed to run again in 2008. Oh, damn. We should keep this to ourselves.

2006-06-29 06:25:00 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

No, but the REAL scary thought is...

If he declairs Martial Law on the whole country he can serve indefinate if he makes up enough excusses to keep Martial Law in effect.

;-)
Twisted...

2006-06-29 07:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by Am 4 · 1 0

We know the truth is this ultra liberal Supreme Court actually upheld the law and prevented another lying democrat from breaking laws to steal the election. Selected...what liberal BS.

But, lets play along. I'd still rather vote to have him than some dishonest, traitorous carpetbagger like * Clinton. The first one trashed the country, the second one would sell it to the Useless Nations and literally throw out the Constitution.

2006-06-29 16:00:51 · answer #2 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 0

hehe, that's funny.

Seriously, Democrats have been working on the 2008 elections since two days after the 2004 elections. It's hilarious. I'm waiting for them to run out of steam in January 2008. ;-)

Go Republicans! ;-)

2006-06-29 13:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by bablunt 3 · 0 0

Actually KooKoo (your name speaks volumes about your character by the way)

No person shall be ELECTED to the office of the President more than twice...

He can't run again but you were still wrong about the constitution. Maybe you should reread it. That is where many of you liberals go wrong.

Says the US Constitution...

2006-06-29 14:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, because to the Republicans, he WAS elected in 2000. Haven't you learned anything yet? You can't teach them the truth.

2006-06-29 13:28:57 · answer #5 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 0 0

kookoo bananas is right.
Even if Bush wasn't elected for either of the two terms, he will have SERVED as president for 8 years at the end of this term, and can no longer run for office or serve.

2006-06-29 13:29:44 · answer #6 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 0 0

Beats the livin' $hit out of 16 years of Clintons.

2006-06-30 21:53:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He should run again and eat dust....when he loses BIG time!! Dick and Bush in 2008 baby!!!!! Look at his approval ratings. That's a GREAT Idea. Thank you my fellow Liberal.

2006-06-29 13:41:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

But for him to get elected again, he'd have to admit that he wasn't legally elected the first time, and that'd cause such a controversy, it just wouldn't happen.

2006-06-29 13:29:02 · answer #9 · answered by Claire 5 · 0 0

He won't run again.

He's not going to piss off the other half of America THAT much.

It would be chaos if he ran again.


OH! KooKoo has a good point.

2006-06-29 13:28:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers