English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As a Lakers fan, I really don't understand why the Knicks was considered to be in our level in terms of Dynasties. Forget about the locations and the major market crap. The Knicks was never a dominant team. Im not talking about being a good team, Im talkin about being a dominant team. Lakers was dominant for a lot of the years and Spurs was dominant for a lot of the years. If you talkin about championships, it's pretty much the lakers, celtics and bulls. Spurs almost up there. Knicks should not even be in the conversation. How many championship do they have for their franchise history? New York is all about the Yankees. Knicks was never a dynasty to began with. OVER RATED. Now thanks to the genius of Isiah Thomas, they will be a joke in the NBA for a long time to come. I thought my team was bad ever since the Shaq deal but man, even I feel sorry for the Knicks fans. We have a dumb GM but he is smarter than Isiah Thomas I know that for sure.

2006-06-29 06:00:04 · 5 answers · asked by epicwolf 4 in Sports Basketball

5 answers

you're totally right, the knicks may have been successful before, but they could never be considered a dynasty. really the only reason i think anyone gives a damn about the knicks anymore is due to the fact that they play in the garden. at this time the knicks can't even be considered over or under rated because they are not even rated at all. like the dallas cowboys are in the nfl, the knicks are just a rich team who are comprised of a bunch of washed up players no other team can afford or don't really want to invest in due to their age or if they're prone to injury.

2006-06-29 06:11:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes. Our GM is NOWHERE NEAR as dumb as Isiah Thomas. Yes we are basically the only rival of the Celtics for the NBA's greatest all-time dynasty. The Lakers are actually flying under the radar right now. I think they're on a sharp ascent. If they don't compete for a championship next year, it's almost guaranteed they will the next year. And when you have Kobe, anything is possible.

2006-06-29 06:50:46 · answer #2 · answered by Big Z 6 · 0 1

I am no longer a NBA chief in data however i could say he isn't going to be a Michael Jordan or a Wilt Chamberlain. He absolutely will ranking elements this season once they do come again. Also Carmelo is a ball hog and won't deliver him as a lot importunity to attain. But he additionally rankings plenty of speedy breaks. When Amare used to be on suns he and nash did plenty of opt for and rolls with each and every different, which i suppose Lin gets a few elements off of. Another factor he's absolutely competent of having mad assists.

2016-08-30 06:57:08 · answer #3 · answered by golden 4 · 0 0

i totally agree i mean, the problem with the NBA is there are so many teams with just ONE good person: 76ers, cavaliers, bucks, etc. but the only reason they stay alive (barely) is because the rest of the team is O.K. (barely) no offense to igoudala, dalembert. but the knicks have: marbury. and all the others suck no offense nate, and company. but they do.

2006-06-29 06:48:35 · answer #4 · answered by leprichaunezra 2 · 0 1

i know they are

2006-06-29 06:03:42 · answer #5 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers