Why are the feminists against the animal rights people? I thought LA was laid back? Here is the story from the LA times. I guess the big question is , can I get away with calling the City Controller a Chick? http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bikini28jun28,0,5963738.story
2006-06-29
05:41:10
·
21 answers
·
asked by
dr strangelove
6
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
UHHH her name is Chick..I couldnt call her a Johnson now could I?
2006-07-09
18:40:55 ·
update #1
I love watching stupid activists going at each other. Especially when they are on the same team!
2006-07-07 09:57:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Not thing is wrong with Hooters for Neuters. The feminist are really against Hooters and the animal right people are just guilty by association. A true feminist would respect and appreciate a women's choice and right to work, express, and general do what she feels as long as it is within the law. Hooters for Neuters seems like a good way to get a portion of a community that may not neuter there dogs or be an animal right advocate to come out and do the right thing. I do see maybe the gripe with the city being involved directly with a company that is constantly under attack for "objectifying women" I think that was a bad move on the cities part. You definitely can't call her chick, but you can call her Ms. Chick :)
****F.Y.I L.A. is the least laid back city on the West coast ( everyone wants to be a star or knows someone who knows someone ...real pretentious)
2006-07-07 15:08:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by killakali03 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's simple. The feminists don't like animal rights people because they support female AND male animals.
Given their self-righteous hate against anything of the testosterone nature, they would also hate animals' rights people.
Hope that clears up the issue. I would not advise calling the City Controller a Chick--it would probably be offensive in that it is a reminder of the 1950s high school arena where women's rights were not quite expanded as they are now.
2006-07-08 22:55:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing. What I would like to know is why is it the "exploitation" of women? Who's forcing the women to work there? Why isn't it considered taking advantage of the men who go there and leave big tips? I mean, unless you live under a rock, you know what Hooters is about before you take a job there. Right?
2006-07-09 00:58:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by mama 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
And once again the animals are the biggest losers over this. I do think that they could have had a different event than a bikini contest tho. Hooters could have offered coupons for meal discounts or something else -
2006-07-09 10:25:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by petlover 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Feminists are not against animal rights, they're opposed to the exploitation of women. They decided that it was wrong to exploit women even for a good cause. I concur.
2006-07-08 16:47:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by funigyrl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is one of the dumbest ideas I've heard though I see nothing wrong with using whatever means to save lives even if its animals. And everyone knows, put a girl in bikini in front of a car and it sells, put her in front of fruit and it sells, get the point. Use what you can.
2006-07-10 23:01:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Izzo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because feminists are hypocrites who want to control women. Men have been controlling other men for centuries, (slavery). Now, women want to control women. Perhaps, not by force, but by pressure and politics. They claim women should have the right to do what they want. Yet, they oppose women who are contradicting their current agenda.
2006-07-06 21:29:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by man_id_unknown 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The could be a lot of other thins to call an event like that. I do not think there is anything wrong with it I think its pretty clever!!!
2006-07-09 00:54:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Theresa M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone likes to think they are more liberal and edgy then everyone else. They also always think that their cause is the most important. The major weakness of liberals is that they won't come together or acknowledge each other's causes.
2006-07-09 17:12:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Hooters waitresses should bash baby seals ,and eat lots of red meat; while wearing fur coats!
2006-07-07 14:22:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ron D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋