English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Accepting Hitler and Stalin's positions in the top two, who holds the grim accolade of 'Europe's third-worst despot'?

2006-06-29 05:06:15 · 14 answers · asked by rehgnl 1 in Arts & Humanities History

14 answers

Ivan the Terrible?
st

2006-06-29 05:48:31 · answer #1 · answered by Starreply 6 · 9 0

1,000,000–3,000,000 Armenian Massacres (1895-1923) under the despot: Abdul Hamid

400,000 by genocide -Ustasha/Independent State of Croatia genocide of Serbs, Jews, Roma people during World War II (1941-1945) under the reign of Ante Pavelic

100,000–300,000 - Jews massacred in Poland by the Cossacks led by Chmielnitzki, (1648 - 1649)

100,000 - Massacre of Romans by Mithridates VI Eupator (Anatolia, 88 BC)

Catherine de Médicis, was Queen of France who is generally believed to be the instigator of the 70,000 - St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre (France, 1572)

75,000 killed via genocide - England (1509-1547) under King Henry VIII

40,000 - France (1793-1794) under the Jacobin Reign of Terror

2006-06-29 21:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

Napoleon Bonaparte

2006-06-29 14:24:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Going back a bit further in time than previous answers, I would say Ivan the Terrible. Like Stalin, he killed at random with no reason.

2006-06-29 12:31:09 · answer #4 · answered by John The Bear 3 · 0 0

I believe that Ceausescu, the Romanian communist leader, was as bad as Hitler or Stalin. A Romanian may even say that Ceausescu was as bad as both. What Romanians had to go through during his 25 years' rule is unbelievable!

2006-06-29 12:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by Victoria S 1 · 0 0

Pope Innocent the Third

2006-06-29 15:42:34 · answer #6 · answered by meisa777 3 · 0 0

I would say Enver Hoxha of Albania- a crazed and fanatical follower of Maoism. His tyrannical rule paved the way for this nation's myriad of problems today. Slobadan Milosevic would be a close contender for this dubious distinction.

2006-06-29 12:16:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mannie H 3 · 0 0

In terms of arbitrary and psychotic behavoir, although the net body count wasn't nearly so bad, Roman emperors TIberius and Caligula might qualify.

2006-06-29 16:18:49 · answer #8 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0 0

Mao, of course, usually credited with the same or even more kills than Stalin. Pol Pot wins for percentage of population, and Idi Amin for cannibalism.

2006-06-29 13:30:46 · answer #9 · answered by datbbelliotts@prodigy.net 2 · 0 0

I would vote for Ivan the terrible.

Or maybe Vlad of Romania whose bloodthirstiness inspired the Dracula character.

2006-06-29 13:11:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers