English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

in tne past the u.s.govt. likr to over rule the world by thier power of war heads and their strong economy. but they fail to do so as many countries rejects these apppoarches.then they enter in amny countries on the name of terrrorism to control the goverments like in afganistan iraq pakistan and many.when they need the groups the use as legal then they appoarched as the terroist groups when they achive the gaols...........

2006-06-29 04:54:30 · 15 answers · asked by HELMI 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

15 answers

u rite man
cheers

2006-07-12 07:13:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Taliban, and before them the Mujahedin of Afghanistan were just a mean in the global war against communism. The creation of them had only one goal, to get rid of the Soviet union by forcing them to a costly war and cause their economy to collapse.

The Taliban themselves, were creators of the Pakistani government to become the power force in the region, to stop the influence by the Iranian friendly Mujahedin and at the same time, to create a route to the Oil of the old Soviet countries. This is one of the main reasons why many of the ex-Taliban leaders are now back in power in Afghanistan and some are living a happy life in Pakistan!

The western nations have always used the opposition groups to do their dirty work, from the south American military killing gangs to the Iranian Mujahedin (MEK or PMOI or what ever their name is), because they know that countries with not much popular support among their own people, can not handle domestic terrorists for long, sooner or later, they loose control and collapse and as the old British Empire's doctrine went: "divide and concur" so, 3rd world countries are getting divided into smaller countries, fight each other, spend billions of dollars in the arm race against their new neighbors and guess who wins in all different scenarios?

Those who make the bombs, airplanes, machineguns, tanks, battleships and at the same time, when the countries finally stop fighting each other, they are in such a bad shape that they need the good western countries to come in and build their infrastructure, and you can imagine who will do those work?

So conflicts in the 3rd world countries is a double profit for the western countries, they spend some money themselves to "stop" it but in reality, if the world become peaceful and prosperous, then none of the G8 countries will be able to keep up their "way of life" so conflicts must be created, terrorists generated and countries forced into deadly conflicts, and as stupid as the leaders of the 3rd world countries are, this game will go on and on and on and on.

2006-06-29 12:14:25 · answer #2 · answered by ny_farhad 2 · 0 0

sallam i feel some what the same way u do but u need to take into consideration that people in power are a part of the masons who believe in new world order. if u go and look even the king of morocco and arabic country is part of that evil group. go and look it up there is something called morteb which means the leaders who delt with the people in an injustly manner will have the worst form of jehennem. don't u think if the arab governments were not as corrupt as they are 22 arab countries world wide plus the 56 prodominatly muslims countries would join together and defeat their opressors? what hurts me is when i see people ordinary like even americans who do not want to hurt any one end up in the middle of these politicians wars. average people world wide do not agree with the mass slaughtering of innocent people. this is all the doing of governments. what the governments do is go some where start a fight and when they are retaliated against put it on the people to fight for them while the rich politicans sit back and let their "slaves" people in their country do all their fighting for them. don't u think if every country worried about their own country the world would be a more peaceful place? their religion is money. and the way most voting systems work world wide because the people have not gathered the intellegence to ensure the proper checks and balances people are forced to elect butthead A or butthead b. so this is going to keep happening until people world wide get fed of with living in misery because their rich government officials put them in the middle of their money and controling the world wars.

2006-06-29 12:06:19 · answer #3 · answered by wedjb 6 · 0 0

terrorism isn't war of rich people. none of them would blast them self. it is the last horrible scream of any person or folk that has been raped physically and mentally. And it can happen to everyone of us.
I'm not the best friend of US politics, but i have to say, that US is doing just the dirty work for all politicians of this world. And all politics of this world are puppets of the industry. For example Germany, said no, officially, to the war in Iraq, by the same time they aloud the US to land on German territory their transports, with the, so called, imprisoned, terrorists. Although they weren't terrorists according to German politics.
Russia, did not support this either, but only to serve their own industrial interests on Iraq. And by the same time Russia is fighting Chechnya, since years. And calls the !whole folk! terrorists. Interestingly, the terrorists are living on geopolitical very important place, and the country is extremely rich on Oil of highest quality. When Europe got involved, and tried to stop this genocide, Putin directly reminded them, from where they are getting their Gas. And they are silent since then.
I could continue in this way, about every country... but it won't change anything.

2006-07-13 12:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by zaraza 4 · 0 0

There were wars in the Middle East hundreds of years before there was an "America" or "United States". What I wonder is why do so many Muslims want to kill so many people in terrorist attacks. I know most Muslims are kind, devoted, religious people. Many of my friends are Muslim.

Yet there are the many terrorists in this religion who seem to enjoy taking lives in the name of Allah. When a country is attacked by them, what would you expect the country to do? It's a vicious cycle.

People must learn to make friends with their enemies before there will be peace. We are all brothers and sisters in this life.

2006-07-12 07:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by a_phantoms_rose 7 · 0 0

You call Taliban bad. And you call Americans also bad because they propped them up, at some stage, in history. In India, when the Sikh extremist, Bhindrawale created problems for Indira Gandhi government, the opposition accused her of having propped him as a counter force against Akali Dal. In politics, one never knows, when the power centres play against one another. There is no permanent friend or foe in politics. It is more so, in international politics.

All said, there is no condoing the savages, called the Talibans. They have no culture; not an iota of humanity.

2006-07-13 07:43:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ok first off, thanks for your effort at english, but if your going to rip on "the west" learn to speak the language! You're last statement doesn't even make any sense!!!

Second, You people piss me off! You ***** and moan when the US Steps in and helps your sorry a$$es because you can't do it yourself, but when the US doesn't step in then you ***** and moan that you're suffering and no one will lend you a hand! I've heard many many people say that they're sick to death of the crap you're spouting off and if thats REALLY the way the Iraqi people feel about the Americans getting Sadam out of power and stopping them from living in fear and poverty then maybe the US should just get out of everyones business and laugh hysterically when you people can't fight your way out of a wet paper bag wouthout any help!

And please don't feed me any crap about Iraq not wanting them there and being worse off than they were with Sadam, I know first hand thats a huge steaming pile of bull$h1t!

Also please explain to me why there have been documents recently found near where they killed that last terrorist scum saying they were loosing the battle and needed to do everything they could to make it appear they were still in good forces so the US wouldn't know the Al Quada was loosing miserably against the US and allied efforts. Or, that the Iraqi people are happily folourishing in their own government run by their own people!!!Last I checked the US was attacked first on their own soil. If someone was attacking you in your house and killing your kids, would you say "oh well, you killed my family but ill sit quiet in the corner and suck my thumb" Well, maybe you would! But I wouldn't! Id hunt their sorry a$$ down and take them out to make sure they never did it again!

Well, you wouldn't know any of that that because you're obviously a liberal pacifist and YOU my dear are the biggest threat to the world of them all! Buy a spine and think for yourself!

2006-07-12 14:56:51 · answer #7 · answered by Mel 3 · 0 0

I believe the worst terrorists to be the United States.
The US...
thinks it needs to police the globe and sticks it's nose in everyone else's business.
sells arms to anybody with the money. (including terrorists)
Spends billions of dollars on this while ignoring it's own problems at home such as health care, homeless (especially children), and poverty.

The US terrorizes everyone, even it's own citizens.

2006-07-13 11:17:06 · answer #8 · answered by Angelina DeGrizz 3 · 0 0

I do understand. Even in the bible it stated there would be a great deciever. We may be living in the age of the revellation. Know that god (Allah) would never allow these people to go unpunished. You do not have to punish them simply because his wrath will be perfect.

2006-07-13 09:13:00 · answer #9 · answered by Michael H 2 · 0 0

Undoubtedly it is Mr. Bush and the Western world.

2006-07-13 06:41:19 · answer #10 · answered by nimesh 4 · 0 0

both the west provides weapons and stuff to countries that end up in the enemies hands

2006-07-13 04:13:25 · answer #11 · answered by sissy j 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers